团队异质性研究回顾与展望被引量：52

Team Diversity: Measurement, Outcomes and Moderators

在线阅读下载PDF

导出

摘要从团队异质性的分类与测量、异质性的结果变量、异质性研究中的调节变量等方面阐述了团队异质性研究的成果和进展,并在此基础上讨论了未来研究的趋势和发展方向。未来的团队异质性研究需要对不同维度的异质性的交互作用进行分析;其次,异质性研究不仅要关注易观察特质的异质性,同时也需关注深层特质的异质性;最后,需要综合组织的背景,在更大的范围内研究异质性的影响。 This review summarizes recent researches on team diversity. First it is shown that the dimensions of team diversity; Second, the measurements have discussed; Third it analyzes the outcomes of diversity and its moderators. Finally future studies should investigate the interaction between multi-dimensions of diversity and assess underlying diversity as well as readily-detected diversity. What＇s more, researchers should consider the context of organization, and explore outcomes of diversity in wider range.

作者刘嘉许燕

机构地区北京师范大学心理学院

出处《心理科学进展》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2006年第4期636-640,共5页 Advances in Psychological Science

关键词团队异质性深层特质异质性异质性的结果调节变量 team diversity, underlying diversity, outcomes of diversity, moderator

分类号 B849 [哲学宗教—应用心理学] C93 [经济管理—管理学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献16

1Katzenbach J R, Smith D K. The discipline of teams. Harvard Business Review, 1993, 71:111-20
2Susan E J, Aparna J, Niclas L E. Recent research on team and organizational diversity: SWOT analysis and implications.Journal of management, 2003, 29(6): 801-830
3Lim B C. Ph.D. Thesis, Do the leader and members make the team? The role of personality and cognitive ability.University of Maryland college park, Maryland, 2003
4Tsui A S, O'Reilly C A. Beyond simple demographic effect:The importance of relational demography in superior-subordinate dyads. Academy of management journal, 1989,32:402-423
5Williams K Y, O'Reilly C A. Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. Research in organization behavior, 1998, 20:77-140
6Jehn K A, Chadwick C, Thatcher S. To agree or not to agree:The effects of value congruence, member diversity and conflict on workgroup outcomes. International journal of conflict management, 1997, 8:287-305
7Putney D M. Ph.D. Thesis, SWAT Team composition and effectiveness. The University of tennessee, Knoxville, 2003
8Simons T, Pelled L H, Smith K A. Making use of difference: Diversity, debate, and decision comprehensiveness in top management teams. Academy of management journal, 1999,42:662-4573
9Jehn K A, Northcraft G B, Neale M A. Why differences make a difference: A field study in diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Administrative science quarterly,1999, 44(4): 741-763
10Bunderson J S, Sutcliffe K M. Comparing alternative conceptualizations of functional diversity in management teams: Process and performance effects. Academy of management journal, 2002, 45:875-893