摘要
目的:对比研究水合氯醛在检查治疗前,对不同年龄段患儿应用不同给药途径的镇静效果。方法:对417例需检查治疗的患儿,按年龄分为婴儿组117例,幼儿组158例,学龄前组142例,同组患儿随机给予口服或肛注10%水合氯醛,观察对比其镇静效果。结果:婴儿组口服给药镇静效果明显优于肛注法给药(P<0.01),幼儿及学龄前组肛注法给药镇静效果明显优于口服给药(P<0.01)。结论:应用10%水合氯醛镇静,婴儿宜选用口服法,幼儿及学龄前患儿宜选用肛注法给药。
Objective ： Study on the calmative effects of chloral hydrate given by oral and clysis mutes in children with different ages before examination and therapy. Methods： Before examination and therapy 417 Patients were divided into three groups： infants less than 1 yeara（117）, little children 1 - 3years （158）, and children before school age （142）. Then they were randomly derided into oral group and clysis group. Result ：By the comparison of the anesthetic effect of different mutes, the calmative effects of oral routes were significantly better than those of clysis mutes in the group of infants（ P 〈 0.01 ）, while those of clysis routes were better than those of oral mutes in the group of little children and children before school age（ P 〈 0.01 ）. Conclusion ：The result shows that using chloral hydrate to clam, orally in infant and clysis in little children and children before school age. Key words Chloral hydrate; Infants and young children;The children before school age;Oral mutes tClysis mutes
出处
《护理实践与研究》
2006年第4期6-7,共2页
Nursing Practice and Research
关键词
水合氯醛
婴幼儿
学龄前儿童
口服
肛注
Chloral hydrate
Infants and young children
The children before school age
Oral routes
Clysis routes
