期刊文献+

颅面部螺旋CT三维线距测量的准确性评价 被引量:21

The accuracy of 3D-CT volume rendering for craniofacial linear measurements
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:研究颅面部螺旋CT三维线距测量与实测距离的一致性。方法:选择12个干燥头颅,采用GE公司16层螺旋CT常规扫描后,将头颅数据转至工作站,进行颅颌面三维重建。选择正畸常用的16个颅面骨性解剖标志点,分别使用DisplayTools测量工具和游标卡尺进行20个项目测量。采用SAS9.0统计软件包进行配对t检验,比较螺旋CT三维线距测量与实测距离的一致性。结果:螺旋CT三维线距测量与游标卡尺实测结果相比,P值范围为0.0995~0.9812,所有测量项目均无显著性差异。结论:螺旋CT体绘制图像颅面解剖标志点间线性距离与实测距离具有一致性,螺旋CT三维测量有望替代实际测量,用于头影测量分析。 PURPOSE: This study was designed to determine the consistency of craniofacial measurements using spiral computed tomography volume rendering by computer systems and sliding caliper. METHODS: The study population consisted of 12 cadaver heads which were examined with spiral CT. The archived CT data were transferred to a workstation, and 3D-CT volume rendered images were generated using computer graphics tools. Linear measurements (n= 20), based upon conventional craniometric anatomical landmarks (n=16) were made, by Display Tools and sliding caliper respectively. The consistency between the two measurements was analyzed by paired t test using SAS9.0 software package. RESULTS: The results demonstrated no statistically significant difference between imaging measurement and physical measurement, P〉0.05. CONCLUSIONS: There is significant consistency between spiral CT measurement and physical measurement for craniofacial linear distance. 3D-CT volume rendering images using craniometric measurements can be used for clinical and basic studies in stomatology.
出处 《上海口腔医学》 CAS CSCD 2006年第5期517-520,共4页 Shanghai Journal of Stomatology
基金 山东省科技厅2005年攻关项目(2005GG4202017)~~
关键词 螺旋CT 颅面 实际测量 线距 准确性分析 Spiral computed tomography Craniofacial region Physical measurement Linear measurement Accuracy analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Miller AJ,Maki K,Hatcher DC.New diagnostic tools in orthodontics[J].Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,2004,126(4):395-396.
  • 2Togashi K,Kitaura H,Yonetsu K,et al.Three-dimensional cephalometry using helical computer tomography:Measurement error caused by head inclination[J].Angle Orthod,2002,72(6):513-520.
  • 3Matteson SR,Bechtold W,Phillips C,et al.A method for threedimensional image reformation for quantitative cephalometric analysis[J].J Oral Maxillofac Surg,1989,47(10):1053-1061.
  • 4Hildebolt CF,Vannier MW,Knapp RH.Validation study of skull three-dimensional computerized tomography measurements[J].Am J Phys Anthropol,1990,82(3):283-294.
  • 5Kragskov J,Gyldensten G,Sindet-Pedersen S.Comparison of the reliability of craniofacial anatomic landmarks based on cephalometric radiographs and the three-dimensional CT scan[J].Cleft Palate-Craniofac J,1997,34(2):111-116.
  • 6Richtsmeier J,Paik CH,Elfert PC,et al.Precision,repeatability of the localization of cranial landmarks using computed tomography scans[J].Cleft Palate-Craniofac J,1995,32(3):217-227.
  • 7赵保东,李宁毅,周仰光,宫大连,谭成勋.下颌骨的三维重建及实体解剖研究[J].华西口腔医学杂志,2002,20(1):21-23. 被引量:44

二级参考文献9

  • 1涂玲,罗远才,剪新春.下颌牙槽骨的测量研究[J].口腔医学纵横,1994,10(1):7-9. 被引量:8
  • 2李德华,刘宝林,陈小文.68副中国成人离体下颌骨颏部的测量[J].实用口腔医学杂志,1995,11(2):112-114. 被引量:4
  • 3步荣发 洪民 等.30具成人下颌骨面积与厚度观察[J].中华口腔医学杂志,1988,23:113-113.
  • 4Verstreken K, van Cleynenbreugel J, Martens K,et al. An image-guided planning system for endosseous orai implants. IEEE Trans Med Imaging, 1998,17(5): 842 ~ 852
  • 5Schellhas KP, El Deeb M, Wilkes CH, et al. Three-dimensional computed tomography in maxillofacial surgical planning. Arch Otolaryngol Head Surg, 1988,114(3) :438 ~ 442
  • 6Abrahams JJ. CT assessment of dental implant planning. In: Contemporary Maxillofacial Imaging. Orai & Maxillofacial Surgery Clinics of North America. Philadelphia: Sannders, 1992:19
  • 7Santini A, land M. A comparison of the position of the mental foramen in Chinese and British mandibles. Acta Anat (Basel),1990,137(3) :208 ~ 212
  • 8朱敏.颅颌面立体结构的三维CT重建和临床应用[J].口腔颌面外科杂志,1997,7(3):193-196. 被引量:22
  • 9魏明贵.颅颌面结构三维分析技术研究现状与进展[J].口腔颌面外科杂志,1999,9(4):313-316. 被引量:15

共引文献43

同被引文献316

引证文献21

二级引证文献82

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部