期刊文献+

多层螺旋CT对冠状动脉支架通畅性的评价 被引量:5

Assessment of coronary stent patency by multislice CT angiography
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨多层螺旋CT冠状动脉成像评价冠状动脉支架通畅性的临床效果。方法对26例冠状动脉支架植入术后患者的40枚支架行多层螺旋CT性心电门控增强扫描,所有患者均在CTA之后3个月内再次行CAG检查。评价支架的轴位,多平面重组(MPR)图像及通过支架内腔中心的曲面重组(CPR)图像,计算支架内管腔面积与支架标定的管腔面积的比值以评价支架内腔狭窄程度。CTA结果与CAG判定的结果相比较。结果全部40枚支架腔内狭窄程度的评估,支架腔>50%狭窄的敏感性和特异性分别为71.4%和100%,诊断支架腔<50%狭窄的敏感性和特异性分别为77.8%和93.9%,诊断支架腔内无狭窄的敏感性和特异性分别为87.5%和100%。在一定条件下,16层与64层螺旋CT诊断冠状动脉支架管腔狭窄程度的结果间差异没有显著性(P>0.05)。结论以传统冠状动脉造影(CAG)为金标准,MSCT判断冠状动脉支架再狭窄病变中对于阴性病例及>50%的严重病例具有较高的特异性。 Objective To investigate the clinical value of multislice CT coronary angiography (CTA) in assessment of coronary stent patency. Methods Twenty-six patients with 40 stents were investigated using a retrospective ECG gated enhanced scan by MSCT. CTA findings were correlated to CAG results that were performed within 3 months after the CTA examination. The degree of stenosis was divided into three groups: 0, 0-50%, 50%-100%. CTA images were evaluated through the axial image, MPR and CPR, and the area or diameter of the lumen of stent was accessed. Results For the ones that degree of stenosis were ≥50%, the sensitivity and specificity are 71.4% and 100%, respectively. For those 0-50%, the sensitivity and specificity were 77.8% and 93.9%. For those none stenosis, the sensitivity and specificity were 87.5% and 100%. There was no significant difference between the results taken by 16-slice spiral CT and by 64-slice spiral CT (P 〉0.05). Conclusion Taken CAG as the gold standard, there is relatively high specificity in accessing negative cases and degree of restenosis ≥50% cases when we evaluate the degree of restenosis of coronary stents.
出处 《中国医学影像技术》 CSCD 北大核心 2006年第10期1492-1495,共4页 Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging Technology
关键词 体层摄影术 X线计算机 支架 再狭窄 Tomography, X-ray computed Stents Restenosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Antoniucci D,Valenti R,Santoro GM,et al.Restenosis after coronary stenting in current clinical practice[J].Am Heart J,1998,135(3):510-518.
  • 2Mehran R,Dangas G,Abizaid AS,et al.Angiographic patterns of in-stent restenosis:classification and implications for long-term outcome[J].Circulation,1999,100(18):1872-1878.
  • 3Maintz D,Juergens KU,Wichter T,et al.Imaging of coronary artery stents using multislice computed tomography:in vitro evaluation[J].Eur Radiol,2003,13(4):830-835.
  • 4Mahnken AH,BueckerA,Wildberger JE,et al.Coronary artery stents in multislice computed tomography:in vitro artifact valuation[J].Invest Radiol,2004,39(1):27-33.
  • 5Funabashi N,Komiyama N,Komuro I.Patency of coronary artery lumen surrounded by metallic stent evaluated by three dimensional volume rendering images using ECG gated multislice computed tomography[J].Heart,2003,89(4):388.
  • 6Hong C,Chrysant GS,Woodard PK,et al.Coronary artery stent patency assessed with in-stent contrast enhancement measured at multi-detector row CT angiography:initial experience[J].Radiology,2004,233(1):286-291.
  • 7孔令燕,金征宇,王怡宁,宋兰,张竹花,张立仁,张抒扬,林松柏,王沄,赵文敏.64层螺旋CT冠状动脉成像评价冠状动脉支架通畅性[J].中国医学科学院学报,2006,28(1):32-35. 被引量:44
  • 8Schuijf JD,Bax JJ,Jukema JW,et al.Feasibility of assessment of coronary stent patency using 16-slice computed tomography[J].Am J Cardiol,2004,94(4):427-430.
  • 9Pump H,Mohlenkamp S,Sehnert CA,et al.Coronary arterial stent patency:assessment with electron-beam CT[J].Radiology,2000,214(2):447-452.
  • 10Mohlenkamp S,Pump H,Baumgart D,et al.Minimally invasive evaluation of coronary stents with electron beam computed tomography:in vivo and in vitro experience[J].Catheter Cardiovasc Interv,1999,48(1):39-47.

二级参考文献26

  • 1张竹花 金征宇 李冬晶 等.多层螺旋CT冠状动脉成像研究[J].中华放射学杂志,2003,37(9):147-147.
  • 2De Gregorio J,Kobayashi Y,Albiero R,et al.Coronary artery stenting in the elderly:short-term outcome and long-term angiography and clinical follow-up[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol,1998,32(2):577-583.
  • 3Nieman K,Oudkerk M,Rensing BJ,et al. Coronary angiography with multi-slice computed tomography [J].Lancet,2001,357(9256):599-603.
  • 4Pump H,Mohlenkamp S,Sehnert CA,et al.Electron-beam CT in the noninvasive assessment of coronary stent patency[J].Acad Radiol,1998,5(12):858-862.
  • 5Lu B, Dai RP, Bai H, et al. Detection and analysis of intracoronary artery stent after PTCA using contrast-enhanced three-dimensional electron beam tomography[J]. J Invasive Cardiol,2000,12(1):23-24.
  • 6Pump H, Mohlenkamp S, Sehnert CA, et al. Coronary arterial stent patency:assessment with electron beam CT[J]. Radiology,2000,214(2):447-452.
  • 7Schmermund A, Haude M,Baumgart D, et al. Noninvasive assessment of coronary Palmaz-Schatzstents by contrast enhanced electron beam computed tomography[J]. Eur Heart J,1996,17(4):1546-1553.
  • 8Maintz D, Botnar RM, Fischach R, et al. Coronary magnetic resonance angiography for assessment of the stent lumen:a phantom study. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson, 2002;4(3):359~367
  • 9Pump H,Mohlenkamp S,Sehnert CA,et al. Coronary arterial stent patency:assessment with electron-baem CT. Radiology,2000;214(2):447~452
  • 10Kruger S, Mahnken AH, Sinha AM, et al. Multislice spiral computed tomography for the detection of coronary stent restenosis and patency. Int J Cardiol, 2003;89 (2-3):167~172

共引文献49

同被引文献50

引证文献5

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部