摘要
两大法系犯罪构成具有推定功能,由于推定同时也是一个诉讼法概念,因而使犯罪构成具有诉讼功能,其不仅决定着刑事诉讼证明责任的分配,而且决定着证明标准的选择。我国犯罪构成源自前苏联,前苏联在改造大陆法系犯罪成立体系时,在内容上抛弃了违法性要件,并在结构上破坏了其层次性,导致该体系推定机能的丧失。为此,需要恢复我国犯罪构成体系的推定机能,以实现对刑事诉讼证明问题的指导,从而恢复犯罪构成体系的诉讼功能。
The constitution of crimes in two legal systems has the function of presumption. That the presumption is also the procedural concept puts the procedural function into the constitution of crimes. It decides both the burden of proof and the standard of proof. The constitution of crimes in our country comes directly from the former Soviet Union. When the former Soviet Union established its own system about the constitution of crimes, it abandoned the elements of illegality and broke its structure level, which made the function of presumption of the constitution about crimes lost. In order to make the procedural function return to the constitution of crimes, we should retrieve the presumption function of the constitution about crimes.
出处
《四川大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2006年第6期124-129,共6页
Journal of Sichuan University：Philosophy and Social Science Edition
关键词
犯罪构成
推定机能
诉讼功能
证明责任
证明标准
the constitution of crimes
presumption
procedural function
the burden of proof
the standard of proof
