摘要
目的观察不同方法对胶囊内镜检查前肠道准备的清洁效果和患者主观感受的比较。方法将55例行胶囊内镜检查的患者按肠道准备方法不同随机分为禁食组(A组,n=10)、口服复方导泻液组(B组,n=15)、口服甘露醇组(C组,n=10)及口服甘露醇加福松组(D组,n=20)。根据胶囊内镜检查所见肠道清洁程度(1～10分)及患者主观感受(1～10分)评价效果。结果C组(8.200±0.789)肠道清洁效果明显好于A组(5.500±1.269)、B组(7.330±1.291)(P<0.05)。D组(8.650±0.671)肠道清洁效果略好于C组,但两组间差异没有统计学意义;而就患者主观感受而言,从A组(9.200±0.422)、C组(8.200±0.632)、D组(8.050±0.759)、B组(4.730±1.335)耐受程度依次下降。结论综合清洁效果和患者主观感受而言,口服甘露醇加福松是比较理想的胶囊内镜检查术前的肠道准备方法。
Objective To study the effects of different approaches of bowel preparation before capsule endoscopic examination and compare the patients＇ feeling to them. Methods Fifty-five patients preparing for capsule endoscopy were randomly divided into four groups： abrosia group （group A, n = 10）, oral complex catharsis solution group （group B, n = 15 ）, oral mannitol group （group C ,n = 10） and oral mannitol and maerogol group （group D ,n = 20）. The effects were evaluated by the cleaning level of bowel （score from 1 - 10） and patients＇ subjective feeling （score from 1 - 10） of patients. Results The cleaning level of groupC （8.200±0.789） was higher than group A （5.500±1.269） andgroupB （7.330±1.291） （P〈0.05）,nosignificant difference was found between group C and group D （8.650 ± 0.671 ）. And the patients subjective feelings were decreasing sequentially from group A （9.200 ± 0.422）,group C （8.200 ± 0.632）,group D（8.050 ± 0.759） to group B （4.730 ± 1.335） by turns. Conclusion Regarding the cleaning level of bowel and patients subjective feelings,oral mannitol and maerogol is appropriate for bowel preparation before capsule endoscopic examination.
出处
《生物医学工程与临床》
CAS
2006年第6期372-374,共3页
Biomedical Engineering and Clinical Medicine
关键词
胶囊内镜
肠道准备
小肠
capsule endoscopy
bowel preparation
small intestine
