摘要
目的:探讨两种不同输液手法拔针后皮下淤血的发生率。方法:随机抽取480例病人分为两组,用两种不同输液手法进行对照。结果:改良式静脉输液法与传统静脉输液法发生疼痛、出血的差别有极其显著性(P<0.01)。结论:改良式静脉输液手法对减轻病人痛苦和皮下淤血效果较好,深受患者好评,值得推广应用。
Objective：Inquirying into two kinds of dissimilarities loses the occurrence rate that the liquid skill descends blood clot after pulling out needle the skin. Methods：Sample 480 patients to equally divide 2 sets random, use to lose liquid skill to carry on checking .against differently, Results：The improvement type vein loses liquid method and traditional vein to lose the liquid method occurrence ache, bleeding of the difference have and it shows （p 〈 0. 01 ）, Conclusion：The improvement type vein loses liquid skill to be subjected to sufferer＇s good opinion towards easing patiant＇s pain and sufferings and skin to descend blood clot result beuerly, deeply, deserving an expansion application.
出处
《护理实践与研究》
2007年第1期3-4,共2页
Nursing Practice and Research
关键词
静脉输液
方法
皮下淤血
效果观察
Vein infusion
Method
Subcutaneous extvavasated blood
Effect is observed
