期刊文献+

磁共振弥散加权成像诊断颈部淋巴结的临床价值 被引量:48

Clinical significance of diffusion-weighted MRI with STIR-EPI in differential diagnosis of cervical lymph nodes
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评价颈部淋巴结磁共振(MRI)弥散加权成像(DWI)的可行性,及其在良、恶性淋巴结鉴别诊断中的价值。方法对20例鼻咽癌患者和14例志愿者进行颈部常规MRI和DWI检查,比较两种检查方法对淋巴结的显示能力,并比较正常淋巴结与转移性淋巴结之间表观弥散系数(ADC)差异的统计学意义。扫描采用基于SENSE技术的STIR-EPI-DWI。结果弥散加权成像较常规MRI能更敏感性地显示淋巴结。正常淋巴结的ADC值为(0.975±0.179)×10^-3mm^2/s,转移性淋巴结的ADC值为(0.766±0.119)×10^-3mm^2/s,两者之间的差异有统计学意义(P〈0.01),转移性淋巴结的ADC值明显低于正常淋巴结的ADC值。结论STIR—EPI—DWI能准确和更敏感地显示淋巴结,可作为淋巴结MRI成像的一种新手段,为良恶性淋巴结的鉴别诊断提供了新的方法。 Objective To evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of a new MRI imaging method-- diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) with short TI version recovery-echo planar imaging (STIR-EPI) sequence in differentiating benign cervical lymph nodes from malignant ones. Methods Twenty nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients and fourteen volunteers received both conventional MRI and DWI with STIR-EPI. Ability of detecting lymph nodes between conventional MRI and STIR-EPI-DWI was compared, and the difference of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value between metastatic lymph node and normal lymph node was analyzed. Results DWI was more sensitive in detecting lymph node than conventional MRI. ADC value of metastatic lymph node (0. 766 ±0. 119) × 10^-3 mm^2/s was significantly lower than that of normal lymph node (0. 975 ± 0. 179) × 10^-3 mm^2/s (p 〈 0.01 ). Conclusion As a new MRI imaging technique in detecting cervical lymph nodes, diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) with short TI version recovery-echo planar imaging (STIR-EPI) sequence is more reliable and sensitive than conventional MRI imaging, providing an alternative way to differentiate benign lymph nodes from malignant ones.
出处 《中华肿瘤杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2007年第1期70-73,共4页 Chinese Journal of Oncology
关键词 颈淋巴结 磁共振成像 弥散加权成像 Cervical lymph nodes Magnetic resonance imaging Diffusion-weighted imaging
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1罗德红,石木兰,徐震纲,姚迪冬,吴宁,郝玉芝.颈部转移淋巴结的CT、B超扫描与临床触诊对比分析[J].中华肿瘤杂志,1998,20(1):48-50. 被引量:39
  • 2Som PM. Detection of metastasis in cervical lymph nodes: CT and MR criteria and differential diagnosis. AJR, 1992, 158: 961-969.
  • 3Yoshimi A, Catherine W, Eric k, et al. Evaluation of neck and body metastases to nodes with ferumoxtran 10-enhanced MR imaging:phase safety and efficacy study. Radiology, 2003, 228: 777-788.
  • 4Star-Lack JM, Adalsteinsson E, Adam MF, et al. In vivo 1H MR spectroscopy of human head and neck lymph nodes metastasis and comparison with oxygen tension measurements. AJNR, 2000, 21:183-193.
  • 5梁颖,罗德红,吴宁,李琳,赵心明,蒋力明,黄遥,蒋玲霞,王建卫,孙伟,刘媛,周纯武.颈部恶性淋巴结的多层螺旋CT灌注研究[J].中华放射学杂志,2004,38(11):1193-1197. 被引量:49
  • 6赵斌,蔡世峰,高佩虹,彭洪娟.MR扩散加权成像鉴别乳腺良恶性病变的研究[J].中华放射学杂志,2005,39(5):497-500. 被引量:146
  • 7Takahara T, Imai Y, Yamashita T, et al. Diffusion weighted whole body imaging with background body signal suppression (DWIBS):technical improvement using free breathing, STIR and high resolution 3D dispalay. Radiat Med, 2004, 22: 4275-4282.
  • 8Sugahara T, Korogi Y, Kochi M, et al. Usefulness of diffusion-weighted MRI with echo-planar technique in the evaluation of cellularity in gliomas. J Magn Reson Imaging, 1999, 9: 53-60.
  • 9Ichikawa T, Haradome H, Hachiya J, et al. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging with a single-shot echoplanar sequence: detection and characterization of focal hepatic lesions. A JR, 1998, 170: 397-402.

二级参考文献16

  • 1刘溢,谢敬霞,韩鸿宾,杨渝平,刘淳.磁共振扩散加权成像在乳腺肿瘤的初步应用[J].中国医学影像技术,2003,19(5):548-551. 被引量:38
  • 2汪卫东,中华放射学杂志,1995年,29卷,543页
  • 3Sugahara T, Korogi Y, Kochi M, et al. Usefulness of diffusion-weighted MRI with echo-planar technique in the evaluation of cellularity in gliomas. J Magn Reson Imaging, 1999, 9:53-60.
  • 4Chenevert TL, Stegman LD, Taylor JM, et al. Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging: an early surrogate marker of therapeutic efficacy in brain tumors. J Natl Cancer Inst, 2000,92:2029-2036.
  • 5Ducatman BS, Emery ST, Wang HH. Correlation of histologic grade of breast carcinoma with cytologic features on fine-needle aspiration of the breast. Mod Pathol, 1993,6: 539-543.
  • 6Guo Y, Wang F, Cai Y, et al. Comparison of apparent diffusion coefficient(ADC) with histologic cellularity in breast tumors[abstract]. Scotland. Glasgow: Proceedings of the 9th Annual Meeting of ISMRM, 2001.2326.
  • 7Furman-Haran E, Degani H, Kirshenbaum K, et al. A two-center clinical testing of the 3TP method for contrast enhanced breast MRI. Scotland. Glasgow: Proceedings of the 9th annual meeting of ISMRM, 2001. 566.
  • 8Sinha S, Lucas-Quesada FA, Sinha U, et al. In vivo diffusionweighted MRI of the breast: potential for lesion characterization. J Magn Reson Imaging ,2002,15:693-704.
  • 9Morvan D. In vivo measurement of diffusion and pseudo-diffusion in skeletal muscle at rest and after exercise. Magn Reson Imaging, 1995,13:193-199.
  • 10Folkman J. Tumor angiogenesis: therapeutic implications. N Engl J Med, 1971, 285:1182-1186.

共引文献230

同被引文献450

引证文献48

二级引证文献301

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部