期刊文献+

腹腔镜结肠直肠癌根治手术与传统根治手术疗效的临床比较 被引量:5

Clinical comparison of the effectiveness of laparoscopic radical vs traditional radical operation on colorectal carcinoma
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较腹腔镜结肠直肠癌根治术和传统根治术的临床治疗效果。方法比较我院2003年1月-2006年1月同一手术组完成的30例腹腔镜和46例传统手术结肠直肠癌根治病例的出血量、输血人数、手术时间、吗啡用量、术后住院日和手术前后的血红蛋白量,同时观察手术切除肿瘤的大小、长度、淋巴结清扫数目以及随诊肿瘤的复发、转移情况。结果腹腔镜组的出血量、输血人数、术后吗啡用量和术后住院日明显少于传统手术组。腹腔镜组和传统手术组淋巴结清扫数分别为(11.5±4.5)枚和(11.9±6.2)枚;直肠肿瘤远端切缘分别为(3.4±1.5)cm和(3.0±1.0)cm;复发率分别为3.3%和5.0%;转移率分别为6.6%和10.0%;死亡率分别为3.3%和7.5%。上述观察指标两组差异无统计学意义。结论腹腔镜结肠直肠癌根治可以达到与传统结肠直肠癌根治术同样的根治效果,且创伤小,恢复快。 Objective To investigate the clinical effectiveness of laparoscopic radical resection of coloreetal cancer. Methods Thirty laparoscopic and 46 traditional operation cases during the period of 2003. 1 to 2006. 1 were compared as to haemorrhage, number of patients receiving transfusion, operative time, usage of morphine, hospital stay(days)after operation, size of tumor, the length of samples excised,the number of lymph nodes excised, local recurrence and distant metastasis rate after operation. Results In laparoscopic group, the haemorrhage, number of patients receiving transfusion, usage of morphine, hospital stay after operation were less than in traditional operation group. However, there was no significant difference in size of tumor, the length of samples excised, the number of lymph nodes excised, the distance between tumor and lower end of rectal cancer excised, local recurrence and distant metastasis rate after operation between two groups. In laparoscopic group and traditional operation group,the number of lymph nodes excised was(11. 5± 4. 5)and(11. 9± 6. 2) ,distance between tumor and lower end of rectal cancer excised was(3. 4 ± 1.5)cm and(3. 0 ± 1.0)cm, respectively. Local recurrence after operation was 3. 3% and 5. 0%, distant metastasis rate after operation was 6. 6% and 10. 0%, and mortality after operation was 3. 3% and 7. 5%, respectively. Conclusion Laparoscopic radical operation has the same radical effects as traditional radical operation in treating colorectal carcinoma,with little trauma and quick recovery.
出处 《腹部外科》 2007年第1期41-43,共3页 Journal of Abdominal Surgery
基金 山东省东营市科技发展计划(2005153)
关键词 外科学 腹腔镜 结肠直肠肿瘤 消化系统外科手术方法 Surgical procedures, laparoscopic Colorectal neoplasms Digestive system surgical procedures
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献21

  • 1Min-HuaZheng BoFeng Ai-GuoLu Jian-WenLi Ming-LiangWang Zhi-HaiMao Yan-YanHu FengDong Wei-GuoHu Dong-HuaLi LuZang Yuan-FeiPeng Bao-MingYu.Laparoscopic versus open right hemicolectomy with curative intent for colon carcinoma[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2005,11(3):323-326. 被引量:36
  • 2Kim ZG,Mehl C,Lorenz M,et al.Impact of laparoscopic CO2-insufflation on tumor-associated molecules in cultured colorectal cancer cells [J].Surg Endosc,2002; 16(8) :1182
  • 3Lacy AM,Garcia-Valdecasas JC,Delgado S,et al.Laparoscopy-assisted colcctomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer:a randomised trial [J].Lancet,2002; 359(9325):2224
  • 4Gigot JF,Glineur D,Santiago Azagra J,et al.Laparoscopic liver resection for malignant liver tumors:preliminary results of amulticenterEuropeanstudy[J].AnnSurg,2002; 236(1):90
  • 5Huang MT,Lee WJ,Wang W,et al.Hand-assisted laparoscopic hepatectomy for solid tumor in the posterior portion of the right lobe:initial experience [J].Ann Surg,2003; 238(5):674
  • 6Korolija D,Tadic S,Simic D.Extent of oncological resection in laparoscopic vs.open colorectal surgery:meta-analysis [J].Langenbecks Arch Surg,2003; 387(9-10):366
  • 7Scheidbach H,Schneider C,Hugel O,et al.Oncological quality and preliminary long-term results in laparoscopic colorectal surgery [J].Surg Endosc,2003; 17(6) :903
  • 8Lumley J,Stitz R,Stevenson A,et al.Laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cancer:intermediate to long-term outcomes [J].Dis Colon Rectum,2002; 45(7):867
  • 9Azagra JS,Goergen M,De Simone P,etal.Minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer [J].SurgEndosc,1999; 13(4):351
  • 10Weber KJ,Reyes CD,Gagner M,et al.Comparison of laparoscopic and open gastrectomy for malignant disease [J].Surg Endosc,2003; 17(6):968

共引文献68

同被引文献41

引证文献5

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部