期刊文献+

健康教育干预对儿童哮喘疗效影响的荟萃分析 被引量:26

The influence of health education on the therapy effectiveness of childhood asthma: Meta-analysis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评价健康教育干预对儿童哮喘的治疗效果是否具有显著影响。方法计算机检索相关文献,进行质量评价后按一定标准筛选文献,共纳入12篇随机对照试验研究文献,采用Cochrane协作网的RevMan v4.2.8软件处理,从住院次数、急诊次数、就医次数、哮喘发作次数、学龄患儿缺课天数、呼气流量峰值预计值%(PEF预计值%)预计值%、父母生活质量得分7个方面进行荟萃分析。结果在急诊次数、缺课天数方面,教育干预组与常规治疗组之间的差异存在显著性意义;而在住院次数、就医次数、哮喘发作次数、PEF预计值%、父母生活质量得分方面,教育干预组与常规治疗组之间差异无显著意义。结论目前医护人员针对患有支气管哮喘的儿童及其父母采取了常规治疗外的教育管理干预,对患儿治疗效果的改善起到了一定的作用。但由于诸多因素的影响,教育干预所发挥的作用并不明显,应作进一步研究和探讨,对教育干预开展的方式、内容、地点等进行必要的改进。 Objective To evaluate whether health education has remarkable influence on the therapy effectiveness of childhood asthma, Methods Correlative literature was searched by computer. A total of twelve studies of randomized controlled trial were brought into this research according to the inclusion and the exclusion criteria. Meta-analysis was used in seven aspects including the numbers of hospitalization, emergency department visits, visits physician, asthma attacks and school absenteeism, peak expiratory flow meter of children and parents' quality of life. Results It showed significant differences in numbers of emergency department visits and school absenteeism between the health education intervention group and the control group, but no significant differences in other aspects. Conclusions The health education is good for asthma children and their parents to a certain extent. It is necessary to do further studies on the methods of health education for improvement.
出处 《中华护理杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2007年第3期203-208,共6页 Chinese Journal of Nursing
关键词 健康教育 哮喘 儿童 META分析 Heath education Asthma Child Meta analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Velsor FB, Pigott T, Srof B. A practitioner-based asthma intervention program with African American inner-city school children [J]. J Pediatric Health Care,2005,19(3):163-171.
  • 2Jadad AR,Moore A, Carroll D. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary [J]? Control Clin Trials,1996,17(1) :1-12.
  • 3Moher D,Pham B,Jones A. Does quality of reports of randomized trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in Meta analyses [J].Lancet, 1998,352:609-613.
  • 4Kjaergard LL, Villumsen J, Gluud C. Quality of randomized clinical trials affects estimates of intervention efficacy[M]. Rome:Best Evid Health Care Cochrane Colloq 7th 1999 Univ S Tommaso Daquino,1999:57.
  • 5王吉耀,Gluud C.循证医学与临床实践[M].北京:科学出版社,2004:118—121.
  • 6Sullivan SD, Lee TA, Blough DK. A multisite randomized trial of the effects of physician education and organizational change in chronic asthma care: Cost-effectiveness analysis of the Pediatric Asthma Care Patient Outcomes Research Team Ⅱ (PAC-PORT Ⅱ)[J]. Arch Pediatric Adolescent Med,2005,159(5) :428-434.
  • 7Schonberger H J, Dompeling E. Knotmerus JA. The PREVASC study,The clinical effect of a multifaceted educational intervention to prevent childhood asthma [J]. Euro Respir J,2005,25(4):660-670.
  • 8Khan MS, O'Meara M, Stevermuer TL. Randomized controlled trial of asthma education after discharge from an emergency department [J]. J Pediatric Child Health,2004,40(12) :674-677.
  • 9Hesselink AE, Penninx BW, van der Windt DA. Effectiveness of an education programme by a general practice assistant for asthma and COPD patients: Results from A randomized controlled trial [J]. Patient Educ Couns,2004,55( 1 ) : 121-128.
  • 10Brown R, Bratton SL, Cabana MD. Physician asthma education program improves outcomes for children of low-income families [J].Chest,2004,126(2):369-374.

二级参考文献11

共引文献10

同被引文献397

引证文献26

二级引证文献193

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部