期刊文献+

心理资本对员工的工作绩效、组织承诺及组织公民行为的影响 被引量:416

Effects of Psychological Capital on Employees' Job Performance, Organizational Commitment, and Organizational Citizenship Behavior
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过对198对直接领导和员工的实证研究,探讨了心理资本及希望、乐观和坚韧性三种积极心理状态与员工的工作绩效、组织承诺和组织公民行为之间的关系。结果表明在控制了性别和年龄两个人口统计学变量的效应后,员工的希望、乐观和坚韧性三种积极心理状态,都对他们的工作绩效、组织承诺和组织公民行为有积极影响;员工的希望、乐观和坚韧性三者合并而成的心理资本,对他们的工作绩效、组织承诺和组织公民行为有积极影响。 In the light of the emerging literature on positive psychology and positive organizational behavior (POB), psychological capital can be defined as an individual's positive psychological state of development, which consists of four dimensions: self- efficacy/confidence, hope, optimism, and resiliency. Psychological capital may have positive effects on both performance and work attitudes. To date, a few empirical studies have found positive relationships between psychological capital and performance, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment, but these studies were conducted mainly in the USA, except the study of Luthans et al (2005), and no research so far has ever dealt with the relationship between psychological capital and OCB. To fill in the gap in the literature, this study explored the impact of psychological capital on Chinese workers' performance, organizational commitment, and OCB. The main research hypothesis of this study was hope, optimism, and resiliency, respectively, and when combined them into a core construct of psychological capital, would positively related to Chinese workers'job performance, organizational commitment, and OCB. The sampling procedures of the study involved three steps. First, we chose 67 supervisors from the supervisor name lists provided by the human resource managers of the four coal companies we visited. For each supervisor, we randomly sampled two to three subordinates. After that, the HR manager, along with one of the researchers of the current study, gathered the supervisors in several groups, to explain the purpose and requirements of the study. Each supervisor was given two questionnaires, one for himself/herself to complete (for each subordinate) and the other one for each of the selected subordinates to complete (for themselves). All the questionnaires used in the current study have been tested to be reliable and valid in the Chinese context. We put a matched code numbers on both the subordinate and the supervisor questionnaires. Lastly, the supervisors distributed the subordinate questionnaires to the corresponding subordinates. The researcher returned to the company after two days to collect the survey. In total, 198 sets of supervisor - subordinate dyads constituted the sample for the current study. The results of the study showed that after controlling for the demographic variables (gender and age), employees' hope, optimism, and resiliency separately had positive impacts on their job performance, organizational commitment and organizational citizenship behavior. Employees' psychological capital (a combined construct of hope, optimism, and resiliency) had positive impacts on their job performance, organizational commitment and organizational citizenship behavior. To sum up, this study empirically tested the positive relationship between psychological capital and employees' outcomes. The research results indicated that psychological capital had positive impacts on employee's performance, organizational commitment, and OCB. In order to enhance the competitive advantages of both employees and organization, one of the available and sustainable ways can be to invest, manage, and develop the employees' psychological capital.
作者 仲理峰
出处 《心理学报》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2007年第2期328-334,共7页 Acta Psychologica Sinica
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(资助号:70302004)。
关键词 心理资本 工作绩效 组织承诺 组织公民行为 psychological capital, job performance, organizational commitment, organizational citizenship behavior
  • 相关文献

参考文献37

  • 1Seligman M E P.The president's address.American Psychologist,1999,54:5~14
  • 2Seligman M E P.Authentic happiness.New York:Free Press,2002
  • 3Seligman M E P,Csikszentmihalyi M.Positive psychology:An introduction.American Psychologist,2000:5~14
  • 4Snyder C R,Lopez S (Eds.).Handbook of Positive Psychology.New York:Oxford University Press,2002
  • 5Gable S L,Haidt J.What (and why) is positive psychology? Review of General Psychology,2005,9:103~110
  • 6Linley P A,Joseph S.Positive psychology in practice.New Jersey:John Wiley & Sons,2004
  • 7Luthans F.The need for and meaning of positive organizational behavior.Journal of Organizational Behavior,2002,23:695~706
  • 8Luthans F.Positive organizational behavior:Developing and managing psychological strengths.Academy of Management Exective.2002,16:57~72
  • 9Luthans F,Youssef C M.Human,social,and now positive psychological capital management:Investing in people for compitvie advantage.Organizational Dynamics,2004,33:143~160
  • 10Luthans F.The case for positive organizational behavior (POB).Current Issues in Management,2001,1:10~21

同被引文献4950

引证文献416

二级引证文献4432

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部