摘要
语言与现实的关系问题似乎在维特根斯坦后期学说中得到了解答。然而,在里斯看来,维特根斯坦虽然给这一古题提供了解释,但未能揭示问题的本质。语言与现实的关系在生活形式上有所体现,但生活形式并非就是人们话语互动与互明的本质基础。语言是“共晓性”的联合,而不是任何形式(包括生活形式)或规则的联合。语言共晓性的联合才是话语可能性的本质所在。
The question about the relation between language and reality is age-old. Answers seem to be found in the later philosophy of Wittgenstein, but some doubts over such theories as language games, the analogy between language and tool, family resemblan- ce, etc. have been expressed by Rush Rhees, who has attempted to subject Wittgenstein to critical examination. Based on this, the present paper offers an insight into the possibility of discourse from Rhees＇ perspective and holds that in language there must be a unity of common intelligibility, rather than a unity of form or rules. It is the unity of common intelligibility that guarantees the understandability of discourse.
出处
《外语学刊》
CSSCI
北大核心
2007年第2期20-24,共5页
Foreign Language Research
关键词
里斯
维特根斯坦
话语可能性
共晓性
联合
Rhees
Wittgenstein
the possibility of discourse
common intelligibility
unity
