期刊文献+

利用浮标资料初步评估NCEP再分析湍通量 被引量:1

A preliminary estimation on NCEP reanalysis turbulent flux by buoy data
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过与浮标观测资料的对比分析,指出NCEP动量通量、再计算NCEP热通量更能够代表NCEP再分析数据库的数值模拟效果。当风速大于20m/s时,数值模拟的湍通量低于浮标块体湍通量,当风速在10~20m/s时,数值模拟的湍通量高于浮标块体湍通量。同时还发现数值模拟结果的延迟现象,以及不能反映大风过后快速的海气温差变化而引起的感热通量变化。 The comparisons and analysis of turbulent flux between NCEP reanalysis data and buoy data show that NCEP momentum flux and recalculated NCEP heat flux can represent the effect of numerical simulation of NCEP reanalysis database better. When wind speed exceeds 20m/s, the turbulent flux of numical simulation is smaller than buoy bulk turbulent flux. When wind speeds occur from 10m/s to 20m/s, the turbulent flux of numical simulation is larger than buoy bulk turbulent flux. Meantime, the delay phenomena of nuluical simulation result is found, and the change of sensitive heat flux caused by the quickly change of air sea temperature difference after large wind can not be expressed well.
出处 《海洋预报》 2007年第2期74-82,共9页 Marine Forecasts
关键词 浮标资料 NCEP再分析 湍通量 Bouy data NCEP reanalsis turbulent flux
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Renfrew I A, G W K Moore, P S Guest, K Bumke. A comparison of surface layer and surface turbulence flux observation over the Labrador Sea with ECMWF analyses and NCEP reanalyses [J]. J Phys Oceanogr. 2002,32: 383 - 400.
  • 2Sun Bomin, Lisan Yu, Robert A. Weller. Comparisons of Surface Meteorology and Turbulent Heat Fluxes over the Atlantic: NWP Model Analyses versus Moored Buoy Observations [J]. J Climate, 2003,16:679 - 695.
  • 3Yu Lisan, Robert A, Weller, Bomin Sun. Mean and Variability of the WHOI Daily Latent and Sensible Heat Fluxes at In Situ Flux Measurement Sites in the Atlantic Ocean [J]. J Climate,2004,17:2096-2118.
  • 4史剑,赵栋梁,孙建.块体空气动力算法的再计算湍通量与NCEP湍通量的比较[J].中国海洋大学学报(自然科学版),2006,36(B05):15-19. 被引量:1
  • 5KalnayE,coauthors.The NCEP/NCAR40一YearReanalysis Project[J].BullAmer MeteorSoc,1996,77:437~47l.
  • 6Kanamitsu M, coauthors. Overview ofNCEP/DOE reanalysis-2, Proceedings of the Second WCRP International Conference oil Reanalysis [C]. UK, 237 August 1999, WMO/TD-No. 985,1.
  • 7Kanamitsu M, coauthors. TheNCEP-DOE AMIP-II Reanalysis (R-2) [J]. Bull AmerMeteorSoc, 2002,83:1631 - 1643.
  • 8Fairall C W, E F Bradley, J E Itare, et al. Bulk Parameterization of Air-Sea Fluxes: Updates and Verification for the COARE Algorithm [J]. J Climate, 2003,16:571 - 591.
  • 9Brunke M A, coauthors. Which Bulk Aerodynamic Algorithm are Least Problematic in Computing Ocean Surface Turbulent Fluxes [J]. J Climate, 2003,16:619 - 635.
  • 10杨清华,张蕴斐,孙兰涛,吴辉碇.COARE算法估算海气界面热通量的个例对比分析[J].海洋预报,2005,22(4):1-13. 被引量:10

二级参考文献15

  • 1孙兰涛,宋宇,张蕴斐,吴辉碇.一个嵌套于MM5的高分辨率大气边界层模式[J].海洋预报,2005,22(z1):94-105. 被引量:2
  • 2蒋国荣,何金海,吴咏明,阎俊岳,姚华栋.海-气界面通量计算模式的敏感性试验研究[J].热带气象学报,2004,20(4):346-354. 被引量:3
  • 3孙即霖,刘秦玉.南海夏季风爆发时期的大气环流变化特征[J].中国海洋大学学报(自然科学版),2004,34(5):727-736. 被引量:3
  • 4姚华栋,李骥,丁一汇.TOGA-COAREIOP海表通量估算[J].气象学报,1996,54(6):693-708. 被引量:3
  • 5C W Fairall, E F Bradley, J E Hare, A A Grachev, et al. Bulk Parameterization of Air-Sea Fluxes: Updates and Verification for the COARE Algorithm. JOURNAL OF CLIMATE. 2003,16: 571~591.
  • 6Brunke M A, C W Fairall, X Zeng, L Eymard and J A Curry. Which Bulk Aerodynamic Algorithms are Least Problematic in Computing Ocean Surface Turbulent Fluxes? JOURNAL OF CLIMATE. 2003, 16: 619~635.
  • 7C W Fairall, E F Bradley, D P Rogers, J B Edson and G S Young, Bulk parameterization of air-sea fluxes for TOGA COARE[J]. J Geophys Res, 1996b, 101: 3747~3764.
  • 8C W Fairall, A A Grachev, E F Bradley and J B Edson. Preliminary Results From The ETL Open Ocean Air-Sea Flux Database. Preprints, 11 th Conf. on Interaction of the sea and Air, San Diego, C A, Amer Meteor Soc, 1996b, 5~8.
  • 9Businger J A, J C Wyngaard, Y Izumi and E F Bradley. Flux profile relationships in the atmospheric surface layer. J Atmos Sci, 1971, 28: 181~189.
  • 10Hong S Y and H L Pan. Nonlocal boundary layer vertical diffusion in a medium-range forecast model. Mon Wea Rev, 1996,124: 2322~2339.

共引文献9

同被引文献23

  • 1张增海,姜华,王辉,左军成.南海西南季风期NCEP2湍流热通量的质量分析[J].海洋学报,2006,28(2):29-38. 被引量:5
  • 2Kalnay E, Kanamitsu M, Kistler R, et al. The ncep/ncar 40-year reanalysis project [J]. Bull Amer Meteor Soc, 1996, 77: 437-471.
  • 3Kanamitsu M, Ebisuzaki W, Woolen J, et al. Overview of ncep/doe reanalysis-2 [EB/OL]. [2011-01-02]. http:// dss.ucar.edu/datasets/ds091.0/docs/ncep-docs/r2sumshort.pdf.
  • 4Kanamitsu M, Ebisuzaki W, Woolen J, et al. The ncep-doe amip-II reanalysis (r-2) [J]. Bull Amer Meteor Soc, 2002, 83: 1631-1643.
  • 5Weller R A, Baumgartner M F, Josey S A, et al. Atmospheric forcing in the Arabian Sea during 1994-1995.
  • 6observations and comparisons with climatology and models [J]. Deep-Sea research Part II-Topical Studies in Oceanography, 1998, 45B: 1961-1999.
  • 7Zeng Xubin, Zhao Ming, Dickinson R E. Intercomparison of bulk aerodynamic algorithms for the computation of sea surface fluxes using toga coare and tao data [J]. Journal of Climate, 1998, 11: 2628-2644.
  • 8Wang W, McPhaden M J. What is the mean seasonal cycle of surface heat flux in the equatorial Pacific? [J]. Journal of Geophysical Research-Oceans, 2001, 106: 837-857.
  • 9Moyer K A, Weller R A. Observations of surface forcing from the subduction experiment: a comparison with global model products and climatological datasets [J]. Journal of Climate, 1997, 10: 2725-2742.
  • 10Josey S A. A comparison of ecmwf, ncep-ncar, and soc surface heat fluxes with moored buoy measurements in the subduction region of the Northeast Atlantic [J]. Journal of Climate, 2001, 14: 1780-1789.

引证文献1

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部