期刊文献+

持续植物状态34例患者的评估 被引量:2

Evaluation of persistent vegetative state of 34 patients
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨准确、可靠、客观的床旁持续植物状态评估方法。方法对34例脑损害后昏迷转为持续植物状态的患者进行脑功能评估。临床指标包括意识状态、7项脑干反射、4项脑神经支配活动、3项脊髓反射、1项脊髓自动反射和2项脊神经支配活动;神经电生理指标包括脑电图(Youg 分级评估标准)、脑干听觉诱发电位和短潜伏期体感诱发电位(Cant 分级评估标准)。结果缺血缺氧性脑损害(30/34,88.2%)是最常见的脑损害原因。意识状态从早期浅度、中度或深度昏迷转为睁眼昏迷,脑干反射和脑神经支配的活动全部或部分存在,肢体自主运动部分存在或消失,脊髓反射全部或部分存在,脊髓自动反射全部或部分存在,脊髓病理反射部分阳性。脑电图判定Ⅰ级和Ⅵ级的分别为64.5%(20/31)和29.0%(9/31),Ⅲ级和Ⅳ级的共6.5%(2/31)。脑干听觉诱发电位判定Ⅰ级、Ⅱ级和Ⅲ级的分别为34.8%(8/23)、21.7%(5/23)和43.5%(10/23)。短潜伏期体感诱发电位判定Ⅰ级和Ⅲ级的分别为43.5%(10/23)和52.2%(12/23),Ⅱ级的仅4.4%(1/23)。全部34例患者中死亡10例(29.4%),在35~90d 内意识清醒者4例(11.8%)。结论临床指标符合持续植物状态患者的脑功能状态存在差异,多项电生理技术的联合可对其做出准确、客观、可靠的评定,并为临床医疗决策提供重要参考意见。 Objective To investigate an accurate, reliable and objective method to evaluate persistent vegetative state at bedside. Methods The brain function of 34 cases with persistent vegetative state as a result of acute brain injury was evaluated, involving clinical examinations and neuroelectrophysiological evaluations( EEG, BAEP, SLSEP). Results The most common cause of brain damage was anoxic encephalopathy (30/34,88. 2% ). The patients were in mild, moderate or deep coma with complete or partial existence of brainstem reflection, activities distributed by cerebral nerves, voluntary extremity activities, spinal cord reflection and automatic spinal cord reflection as well as partial existence of pathologic reflection. According to the Young Criteria of EEG, 64. 5% (20/31) and 29.0% (9/31) of the cases were in grade Ⅰand Ⅵrespectively, 6. 5% (2/31) were in grade Ⅲand Ⅳ. According to the Cant Criteria of evoked potential, 34. 8% ( 8/23 ), 21.7% ( 5/23 ) and 43.5% ( 10/23 ) of the cases were in grade Ⅰ, Ⅱand HI of brainstem auditory evoked potential, respectively. 43.5% ( 10/23 ), 4. 4% ( 12/23 ) and 52.2% (12/23) were in grade Ⅰ, Ⅱand Ⅲof short-latency somatosensory evoked potential respectively. 29.4% (10/34) of 34 cases died, and 11.8% (4/34) resuscitated during 35--90 days. Conclusion Combination of multiple neuroelectrophysiological tests was an accurate, reliable and objective approach to evaluate the brain function of patients with persistent vegetative state, which provides evidence for decision-making in agrypnotic therapy.
出处 《中华神经科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2007年第5期329-332,共4页 Chinese Journal of Neurology
基金 北京市科委资助项目(953304003)
关键词 持续植物人状态 脑电描记术 诱发电位 预后 Persistent vegetative state Electroencephalography Evoked potentials Prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Jennett B, Plum F. Persistent vegetative state after brain damage. A syndrome in search of a name. Lancet, 1972, 1:734-735.
  • 2Medical aspects of the persistent vegetative state ( 1 ). Ten Multi- Society Task Force on PVS. N Engl J Med, 1994, 330: 1499- 1508.
  • 3张国瑾,王传民,丁新生.中国持续性植物状态的诊断标准及评分量表[J].中国急救医学,1999,19(10):632-633. 被引量:74
  • 4Young GB, McLachlan RS, Kreeft JH, et al. An electroencephalographic classification for coma. Can J Neurol Sci, 1997, 24: 320-325.
  • 5Cant BR,Hume AL, Judsen JA, et al. The assessment of severe head injury by short-latency sematosensery and brain-stem auditory evoked potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 1986, 65 : 188-195.
  • 6Brenner RP. The interpretation of the EEG in stupor and coma. Neurologist, 2005, 11:271-284.
  • 7Zandbergen EG, de Haan R J, Stoutenbeek CP, et al. Systematic review of early prediction of poor outcome in anoxic-ischaemic coma. Lancet, 1998, 352: 1808-1812.
  • 8Madl C, Holzer M. Brain function after resuscitation from cardiac arrest. Curr Opin Crit Care, 2004, 10: 213-217.
  • 9Logi F, Fischer C, Murri L, et al. The prognostic value of evoked responses from primary somatosensory and auditory cortex in comatose patients. Clin Neurophysiol, 2003, 114 : 1615-1627.
  • 10Zingler VC, Krumm B, Bertsch T, et al. Early prediction of neurological outcome after cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a multimodal approach combining neurobiochemical and electrophysiological investigations may provide high prognostic certainty in patients after cardiac arrest. Eur Neurol, 2003, 49: 79-84.

二级参考文献19

  • 1张艳,宿英英.脑干听觉诱发电位对重症脑功能损伤的评价[J].中华神经科杂志,2004,37(5):452-454. 被引量:13
  • 2Young GB, McLachlan RS, Kreeft JH, et al. An electroencephalographic classification for coma. Can J Neurol Sci,1997,24:320-325.
  • 3Cant BR, Hume AL, Judson JA,et al.The assessment of severe head injury by short-latency somatosensory and brain-stem auditory evoked potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol,1986, 65:188-195.
  • 4Part 1: introduction to the international guidelines 2000 for CPR and ECC : A consensus on science Circulation, 2000,102:I1-I11.
  • 5Ten Multi-Society Task Force on PVS. Medical aspects of the persistent vegetative state part. N Engl J Med, 1994, 330:1499-1508.
  • 6Hassler W, Steinmetz H, Pirschel J. Transcranial Doppler study of intracranial circulatory arrest.J Neurosurg, 1989,71:195-201.
  • 7Barron SA, Rogovski Z, Hemli J. Autonomic consequences of cerebral hemisphere infarction. Stroke,1994,25:113-116.
  • 8Guilbert JJ. The world health report 2002: reducing risks and promoting healthy life.Educ Health (Abingdon), 2003, 16: 230.
  • 9Madl C, Kramer L, Domanovits H, et al. Improved outcome prediction in unconscious cardiac arrest survivors with sensory evoked potentials compared with clinical assessment. Crit Care Med, 2000, 28: 721-726.
  • 10Judson JA, Cant BR, Shaw NA. Early prediction of outcome from cerebral trauma by somatosensory evoked potentials . Crit Care Med, 1990, 18: 363-368.

共引文献98

同被引文献23

  • 1张艳,宿英英.脑干听觉诱发电位对重症脑功能损伤的评价[J].中华神经科杂志,2004,37(5):452-454. 被引量:13
  • 2宿英英,李红亮.心肺复苏后昏迷患者脑电图模式对预后的预测[J].中国脑血管病杂志,2006,3(11):484-488. 被引量:11
  • 3Lee YC, Phan TG, Jolley D J, et al. Accuracy of clinical signs, SEP, and EEG in predicting outcome of hypoxic coma: a meta- analysis[ J]. Neurology, 2010, 74(7) : 572-580.
  • 4Young GB, Doig G, Ragazzoni A. Anoxic-ischemic encephalopathy: clinical and electrophysiological associations with outcome[J~. Neurocrit Care, 2005, 2(2) : 159-164.
  • 5Zandbergen EG, Koelman JH, de Haan R J, et al. SSEPs and prognosis in postanoxic coma: only short or also long latency responses? [J]. Neurology, 2006, 67(4) : 583-586.
  • 6Su YY, Xiao SY, Haupt WF, et al. Parameters and grading of evoked potentials: prediction of unfavorable outcome in patients with severe stroke[J]. J Clin Neurophysiol, 2010, 27( 1 ): 25- 29.
  • 7Zhang Y, Su YY, Ye H, et al. Predicting comatose patients with acute stroke outcome using middle-latency somatosensory evoked potentials[Jl. Clin Neurophysiol, 2011, 122(8) : 1645-1649.
  • 8Wijdicks EF, Hijdra A, Young GB, et al. Practice parameter: prediction of outcome in comatose survivors after cardiopulmonary resuscitation ( an evidence-based review ) : report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology[J]. Neurology, 2006, 67(2) : 203-210.
  • 9Oddo M, Rossetti AO. Predicting neurological outcome after cardiac arrest[J]. Curt Opin Crit Care, 2011, 17(3) : 254-259.
  • 10van Putten MJ. The N20 in post-anoxic coma: are you hstening? [J]. Ciin Neurophysiol, 2012, 123(7) : 1460-1464.

引证文献2

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部