期刊文献+

评定直线度误差的最小二乘法与最小包容区域法精度之比较 被引量:51

Comparison of evaluating precision of straightness error between least square method and least envelope zone method
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 介绍了直线度误差评定的最小二乘法和最小包容区域法的算法模型与实现方法。在三坐标测量机上对八种不同被测直线进行了采样点坐标数据提取,分别用最小二乘法和最小包容区域法的基于搜索逼近-逐次旋转逼近法进行了给定平面内直线度误差的评定。结果表明:最小二乘法的评定结果与最小包容区域法的基于搜索逼近-逐次旋转逼近法的评定结果完全一致,即直线度误差的最小二乘法评定结果符合最小条件。 The algorithm model and the realization method of evaluating straightness error in least squares method and least envelope zone method were introduced in detail. The experimental data of eight different kinds of straights were obtained on Coordinate Measuring Mechine(CMM). Then the measured data were evaluated by least square method and least envelope zone method based on search approximatioss (namely cut and try method in revolutionally). The experimental results indicate that the two methods are completely consistent and the evaluated result of straightness error by least square method conforms to the least condition.
出处 《光学精密工程》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2007年第6期889-893,共5页 Optics and Precision Engineering
基金 福建省青年科技人才创新资助项目(No.2005J030)
关键词 直线度误差 评定 最小二乘法 最小包容区域法 straightness error evaluation least square method least envelope zone method
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献28

共引文献62

同被引文献358

引证文献51

二级引证文献263

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部