期刊文献+

逆行与顺行输尿管镜术处理输尿管上段嵌顿性结石的疗效比较 被引量:4

Comparison of the outcomes of retrograde and antegrade access ureterolithotripsy for impacted upper ureteric calculi
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较逆行与顺行输尿管镜术处理输尿管上段嵌顿性结石的疗效,并对其安全性与有效性进行评价。方法采用输尿管镜术共治疗输尿管上段嵌顿性结石246例,其中逆行经尿道入路治疗186例,顺行经皮肾微造瘘入路60例。结果逆行经尿道入路手术成功173例(93%),平均手术时间35min,平均住院时间5d,无石率81.2%,22例需ESWL辅助治疗,出现手术并发症9例(4.8%);顺行经皮肾微造瘘入路手术成功60例(100%),平均手术时间55min,平均住院时间8d,无石率100%,无手术并发症发生。结论逆行与顺行输尿管镜术处理输尿管上段嵌顿性结石均有较高的手术成功率与术后无石率;顺行入路的安全性与有效性更好,但手术时间及住院时间更长。 Objective To compare the outcomes of retrograde and antegrade access ureterolithotripsy for impacted upper ureteric calculi and to assess the safety and efficiency of the two types of minimally invasive technique. Methods A total of 246 patients with impacted upper ureteric calculi were treated with ureterolithotripsy. The procedure was performed via retrograde transurethral access in 186 patients and via antegrade percutaneous nephrostomy tract in 60 patients. Results The success rate of retrograde approach was 93%. Mean operating time was 35 min with mean hospital stay of 5 days. The stone free rate was 81. 2% at 1 month follow-up. 22 patients (11. 8%) with residual calculi required ESWL combination. Complications were noted in 4.8%. The success rate of antegrade approach was 100%. Mean operating time was 55 min with mean hospital stay of 8 days. The stone free rate was 100% and no complication was noted. Conclusion Retrograde and antegrade access ureterolithotripsy for impacted upper ureteric calculi are safe and effective. Success rate and stone free rate of antegrade approach are higher than those of the retrograde approach.
出处 《现代泌尿外科杂志》 CAS 2007年第4期236-238,共3页 Journal of Modern Urology
关键词 输尿管结石 输尿管镜术 逆行经尿道入路 顺行经皮肾微造瘘 calculi ureteroscopy retrograde transurethral access antegrade percutaneous nephrostomy tract
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献11

  • 1张国强,徐吉平,袁美凤,陈美大,王伟新,陈鸿花.输尿管结石的临床分类及治疗方案选择[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,1996,17(2):106-108. 被引量:80
  • 2Srlvastava A, Ahlawat R, Kumar A, et al. Management of impacted upper ureterlc calculi: Results of lithotrlpsy and percutaneous litholapaxy. Br J Urol, 1992,70:252-257.
  • 3Jackman SV, Docimo SG, Cadeddu JA, et al. The "mini-pew" technique: a less invasive alternative to petcutaneous nephrolithotomy.World J Urol, 1998,16:371-374.
  • 4Kumar V, Ahlawat R, Banjeree GK, et al. Percutaneous ureterolitholapaxy : the best bet to clear large bulk impacted upper ureteral calculi.Arch Esp Urol, 1996,49:86-91.
  • 5Berkhoff WBC, Meijer F. Percutaneous antegrade tiberoptic ureterorenoscopic treatment of ureteral caculi. J Urol, 1990,144:628-630.
  • 6Liong ML, Clayman RV, Gittes RF, et al. Treatment options for proximal ureteral nrolithiasis: Rewiev and recommendations. J Urol, 1989,141:504-509.
  • 7宋宁家,全国体外震波碎石会议论文汇编,1990年
  • 8郭应禄,中华泌尿外科杂志,1987年,8卷,331页
  • 9李逊,吴开俊.多通道经皮肾穿刺取石治疗复杂性肾结石[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,1998,19(8):469-470. 被引量:373
  • 10赵兴球,谢叔良,陈幽婷,王平宇.输尿管腹段扩张部结石滞留的原因分析[J].临床泌尿外科杂志,1991,6(4):200-201. 被引量:3

共引文献295

同被引文献27

引证文献4

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部