期刊文献+

急诊尿激酶静脉溶栓治疗急性心肌梗塞76例临床研究 被引量:6

Study of intravenous injection urokinase during emergency treatment in 76 patients with acute myocardium infarciton
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:研究急诊静脉溶栓治疗急性心肌梗塞(AMI)的疗效。方法:对76例急诊尿激酶静脉溶栓治疗的AMI病例进行回顾性分析。并以发病至溶栓时间的6h为界分组,比较两组病例的疗效。结果:本组冠脉再通率73.7%;轻度出血发生率11.8%,病死率15.8%,主要死因:心脏泵衰竭和严重心律失常。<6h组的冠脉再通率、轻度出血发生率、病死率分别是:84.0%、10.0%、8.0%;6~12h组分别是53.8%、15.4%、30.8%;两组冠脉再通率、病死率对比有显著性差异(P分别<0.01,<0.05);轻度出血发生率对比无显著性差异。结论:急诊静脉溶栓治疗急性心肌梗塞可以显著提高AMI的救治疗效,值得在基层医院推广。  Objective:To study the effect of intravenous injection urokinase during emergency treatment in 76 patients with acute myocardium infarction(AMI).Methods:Retrospectively analyzed the data of 76 AMI patients treated with intravenous injection urokinase emergency.The 76 patients were divided two groups according time of onset to thrombolysis:〈6 h group and 6~12 h group.The effects of two groups were compared.Results:The recanalization rate of coronary artery was 73.3%,the hyporrea rate was 11.8% and mortality was 15.8% in whole group(76 cases).Compared with 6~12 h group,the recanalization rate increased(84.0%,P〈0.01)and the mortality decreased(8.0%,P〈0.05)in 〈6 h group,but the hyporrea rate was no difference(P〉0.05)between two groups.Conclusion:Intravenous injection urokinase during emergency treatment may increase therapeutic effect for AMI patients;it may be generalized in substrate hospital.
作者 李瑞芬
出处 《心血管康复医学杂志》 CAS 2007年第4期384-386,共3页 Chinese Journal of Cardiovascular Rehabilitation Medicine
关键词 尿激酶 心肌梗塞 血栓溶解疗法 Urokinase Myocardium infarction Thrombolytic therapy
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献22

  • 1罗助荣,盖晓波.延迟性冠脉介入及静脉溶栓对急性心肌梗死预后的影响[J].心血管康复医学杂志,2004,13(5):440-442. 被引量:12
  • 2急性心肌梗塞溶栓疗法参考方案(1996年7月修订)[J].中华心血管病杂志,1996,24(5):328-329. 被引量:1321
  • 3中华心血管病杂志编委会.急性心肌梗死溶栓疗法参考方案[J].中华心血管病杂志,1991,19(3):137-137.
  • 4中华心血管病杂志编委会.急性心肌梗塞、溶栓方法参考方案[J].中华心血管病杂志,1991,19(3):137-137.
  • 5Lincoff AM,Topol EJ. The illusion of reperfusion:does any one achieve optimal reperfusion during acute myocardial infarction. Circulation, 1993,87 : 1792-1805.
  • 6Weaver WD, Cerqueira Hailstorm AP,et ai. Prehospitai Initiated vs hospital- initiated thrombolytic therapy: the myocardial infarction triage and intervention trial JAMA, 1993,270.1211-1216.
  • 7Barron HV, Bowlby LJ, Breent, et al. use of reperfusion Therapy for acute myocardial infarction in the united states: Data from the National Registry of myocardial infarction 2 circulation, 1998,97 : 11.50-6.
  • 8Barron HV,Bowlby LJ,Breen T, et al. Use of reperfusion therapy for acute myocardial infarction in the United states: Date from the national registry of myocardial infarction. Circulation, 1998,97:1150~1156
  • 9Seling M B. Early management of acute myocardial infarction:Thrombolysis angioplasty and adjunctive therapies. AM J Eng Med, 1996,14:209
  • 10Gray D,Keating N A,Murdock J,et al. Impaot of hospital thrombolysis policy on out of hospital response to suspectal myocardial infarction. lancet, 1993,341:645~657

共引文献5105

同被引文献26

引证文献6

二级引证文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部