期刊文献+

合同义务扩张的比较研究

Comparative study on extension of contractual liabilities
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了建立和完善中国合同法中有关合同义务扩张的制度,采用比较研究的方法,分析了大陆法系和英美法系有关合同义务扩张的学说,阐述了我国的合同法理论和现有法律体系,明确了建立和完善我国合同义务扩张制度的必要性和途径。研究表明:国外各种学说的理论基础与建立我国合同义务扩张制度的宗旨具有相同的价值取向,即实现公平、合理的价值取向,利于交易的顺利完成,平衡各方当事人之间的利益。我国是成文法国家,合同义务制度的完善应通过立法的形式,并在实践中辅之以法院的自由裁量权,以求达到法律制度的确定性和审判制度的灵活性之统一。 In order to establish and develop the regulations on extension of contractual liabilities in Chinese Contract Law,through comparative study,the discussion is focused on some similar rules in the Civil Law systems and Common Law systems,the Chinese legal concepts as well as the current statutes.It could be concluded that new rules on extension of contractual liabilities in China and proper approaches are required.The research makes clear that the theoretical basis and value to extend contractual liabilities are the same in China and other countries-justice,reasonableness,smoothing transactions and balancing all parties' interests.In China,the new regulations should be set up by legislation combined with courts' discretion so as to attain certainty of statutes and flexibility in judicial practice.
作者 陈任
出处 《西北大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第5期82-87,共6页 Journal of Northwest University:Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition
基金 司法部基金项目(06SFB3019)
关键词 合同义务扩张 合同第三人 债权人 债务人 extension of contractual liabilities third parties obligee obligor
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Article 1798, French Civil Code.
  • 2BGHZ 93 271 ,VII Civil Senate, (VII ZR 63/84) , Charterflug- decision = NJW 1985.
  • 3[德国]《民法典》第328条.
  • 4120 N B 639 (N. Y. 1918).
  • 5Guy v Liederbach 459 A. 2d 744,751 (Pa. 1983) ; Lucas v Hamm 364 P. 2d 685,689 (Cal. 1961).
  • 6Commend d, The American Restatement Second.
  • 7金融在线.李轩、王亚芳诉铁达房产物业管理公司房屋租赁合同纠纷案[EB/OL].(2007-2-10)[2007-03-05]http://www.1ib.dufe.edu.cn/zjfg/zzfd/gsgl/glsw/JDAL/DSBF%20HTAL/ZPHT/1001.htm.
  • 8MARKESINIS B, LORENZ W, DANNEMANN G. The German Law of Obligations : The Law of Contracts and Restitution-A Comparative Introduction [ M ]. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997.
  • 9ZWEIGERT K, KOTZ H. An Introduction to Comparative Law [ M ]. Oxford : Clarendon Press, 1998:464.
  • 10EISENBERG M. Third Party Beneficiary [ J]. Columbia Law Review, 1992,(92):1358-1390.

共引文献124

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部