摘要
目的比较不同雾化吸入方式治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期（AECOPD）的效果。方法60例AECOPD患者随机分成A组和B组，各30例，A组采用气雾剂加储雾罐，B组采用氧动雾化器的吸入方式雾化吸入硫酸沙丁胺醇、异丙托溴铵和布地奈德混合治疗AECOPD。结果治疗后二组的呼吸困难、肺功能以及动脉血气分析均有所改善，B组的治疗效果优于A组（P〈0．05）。结论临床应用应根据患者病症的状况和不同的需求选择雾化吸入方式，以达到经济、方便和疗效的尽可能的统一。
Objective Comparison was conducted on the effects of different nebulized inhalations in acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease （AECOPD）. Methods Sixty cases with AECOPD were randomly divided into two groups-A and B, A group was treated with metered dose inhalers （MDI） and the cup of nebulizer. B group was inhaled with mixture of salbutamol,ipratropium bromide and budesonide by oxygen nebulization. Results Two groups were both improved on decompensation,pulmonary function and blood gas. But B group had better effects over A group （ P 〈0.05）. Conclusions In order to reach the unity of economy, convenience and effect. Different nebulized inhalations are in choice in accordance with patients＇ specific conditions and different requests as far as possible.
出处
《国际呼吸杂志》
2007年第22期1688-1689,共2页
International Journal of Respiration
关键词
慢性阻塞性肺疾病
急性加重期
雾化吸入
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Acute exacerbation
Neulized inhalation
