期刊文献+

6σ理论在血液分析仪质量控制中的应用探索 被引量:7

An assessment of six sigma for hematology analyzer using quality control data from Shanghai local internal quality control surveys
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的通过对血液分析仪质量控制(QC)数据的σ值研究,探讨如何应用σ值来判断方法性能和选择QC规则。方法从我院2005至2006年Sysmex K-4500和Sysmex KX-21参加上海地区血液分析仪室内QC的数据中抽取12次,采用公式σ值=[允许总误差(TEa)-偏倚(bias)]/变异系数(CV),按照美国临床实验室改进修正法案(CLIA′88)允许误差标准,得出各项的σ值。同时与仪器厂商、血液分析仪组和Sysmex组σ值比较。结果Sysmex K-4500白细胞(WBC)计数、红细胞(RBC)计数、血红蛋白(Hb)量、红细胞压积(Hct)和血小板(PLT)计数等项目σ均值分别为11.09、7.35、11.68、6.01和9.35,Sysmex KX-21分别为8.51、7.55、10.40、6.39和8.55,Sysmex组分别为4.37、3.81、5.63、2.18、5.33,与我院2台仪器比较σ值差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论本实验室Sysmex K-4500和Sysmex KX-21血液分析仪的σ值已达6.0以上,采用13.0s(n=2)QC规则就能满足质量要求,但应注意仪器校准和分析前、后质量问题。 Objective To evaluate the six sigma(6σ) quality management of hematology analyzer through quality control data, and to explore how to choose quality control rules and performance ways of judgment by 6σ mettle. Methods The 6σ mettle values of each parameter were obtained out of the 12 batches of internal quality control data from Sysmex K-4500 and KX-21 hematology analyzers in our hospital participating the Shanghai local hematology analyzers quality control during the years of 2005 -2006, based on the formula of σ = (TEa- bias)/eoeffieient of variation(CV) and in accordance with the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) 88's allowable errors. And these σ metric values were compared with those from manufacturers and the same types of Sysmex's analyzer groups. Results The 6σ mettle values of white blood cell count, red blood cell count, hemoglobin, hematocit and platelet count were 11.09,7.35,11.68,6.01,9.35 and 8.51,7.55,10.40,6.39,8.55 from our K-4500 and KX-21 instruments, respectively, while 4.37,3.81,5.63,2.18,5.33 from Sysmex's groups. There were significant differences ( P 〈 0.01 ) in σ metric values between the instruments in ours and Sysmex's groups. Conclusions The σ metric values from Sysmex K- 4500 and KX-21 in our hospital have been over 6, 0 and hence the single quality control rule of 13.0. ( n = 2 ) could satisfy the quality requirements. But the instrument calibration and any problems occurring in preanalysis and postanalysis should be noted closely.
出处 《检验医学》 CAS 北大核心 2007年第6期707-710,共4页 Laboratory Medicine
关键词 质量管理 质量控制 血液分析仪 Six sigma metric Quality management Quality control Hematology analyzer
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Nevalainen D, Berte L. Kraft C, et al. Evaluating laboratory performance on quality indicators with the six sigma scale [J]. Arch Pathol Lab Med, 2000, 124 (4) :516-519.
  • 2Westgard JO. Six Sigma Quality Design and Control [M]. 2nd ed. Madison: Westgard QC, 2006: 157- 184.
  • 3Westgard JO. Westgard SA. The quality of laboratory testing today: an assessment of σ metrics for analytic quality using performance data from proficiency testing surveys and the CLIA criteria for acceptable perform- ance[J]. Am J Clin Pathol,2006,125(3):343-354.
  • 4Coskun A. Six σ and calculated laboratory tests [J]. Clin Chem,2006.52(4) :770-771.
  • 5Rice S, Aller R. Hematology analyzers[ J ]. CAP today,2000,14( 1 ) :3442.
  • 6Buttarello M. Quality specification in haematology: the automated blood cell count [J]. Clin Chim Acta, 2004.346( 1 ) :45-54.
  • 7Carev RN, Cembrowski GS, Garber CC, et al. Performance characteristics of several roles for self-interpretation of proficient:y testing data [J]. Arch Pathol Lab Med, 2005,129 ( 8 ) : 997-1003.
  • 8Westgard JO, Westgard SA. Equivalent quality testing versus equivalent QC procedures[J]. Lab Medicine, 2005,36(10) :626-629.

同被引文献42

  • 1Westgard JO. Charts of operational process specifications ("OPSpecs charts") for assessing the precision, accuracy and quality control needed to satisfy proficiency testing performance criteria [J]. Clin Chem, 1992,38 (7) : 1226-1233.
  • 2Westgard JO. Six Sigma Quality Design and Control[M ]. 2nd ed. Madison :Westgard QC, 2006: 157-184.
  • 3Coskun A. Six Sigma and calculated laboratory tests[J]. Clin Chem, 2006,52 (4) : 770-771.
  • 4Westgard JO. Charts of operational process specifications (OPSpecs charts) for assessing the precision, accuracy and quality control needed to satisfy proficiency testing performance criteria [ J ]. ClinChem, 1992,38 ( 7 ) : 1226-1233.
  • 5Westgard JO. Six Sigma Quality Design and Contro[ M]. 2td ed. Madison: Westgard QC, 2006: 157-184,259- 278.
  • 6Tetrauh GA, Steinde SJ. Q-probe 94438 [ R]. Daliy quality control exception practices. U. S: College of American Pathologists, 1994.
  • 7Westgard JO, Westgard SA. The quality of laboratory testing today: an assessment of σ metrics for analytic quality using performance data from proficiency testing surveys and the CLIA criteria for acceptable perfonnanee[ J]. Am J Clin Pathol,2006,125(3) :343 -354.
  • 8Nevalainen D, Berte L, Kraft C, et al. Evaluating laboratory performance on quality indicators with the sixsigma scale [ J ] . Arch Pathol Lab Med,2000,124(4) :516 -519.
  • 9Westgard JO. Six sigma quality design and control [ M]. 2nd ed. Madison: Westgard QC,2006:157 - 184.
  • 10黄永富,刘春霞,曹兴建,陶国华.血液分析方法的过程能力与性能及其室内质量控制方法的研究[J].现代检验医学杂志,2007,22(6):106-112. 被引量:2

引证文献7

二级引证文献41

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部