非对称性依赖:中国基金会与政府关系研究被引量：114

Unsymmetrical Dependence:Study on the Relationship between Foundations and Government in China

在线阅读下载PDF

导出

摘要试图回答中国基金会与政府之间究竟存在着怎样的相互关系,以及这种关系的生成机制是什么。运用案例分析的方法,揭示了政府与基金会的互动关系,以及资源获得、资源转化之间的逻辑关系;拓展了资源依赖理论,重视资源转化在获得资源方面的作用,提出在满足"转化的需要、转化的可能、转化的意愿以及转化的意义"等多个条件下,才能成功地实现从一种资源到另一种资源的转化。通过政府合法性约束命题、基金会功能命题、基金会能力限度命题来阐述政府与基金会的各自特征,这些特征表明了在现阶段基金会与政府之间具备了上述资源转化的种种条件。在此基础上,提出了"非对称性依赖"分析框架,来解释基金会与政府之间的相互关系。得出:非对称性依赖是目前基金会与政府关系的表现形式,各种资源之间的成功转化是促成该关系形成的内在机制。 This paper tried to answer what is the relationship between Foundations and Government in China and what is the mechanism of this relationship. Through a case study, this paper displayed the dynamic relationship between government and foundation and the logic of resource acquisition and transformation. Furthermore, it enlarged the 'Resource-Dependence Theory' to how the resources converted from one form to another. The resources would be successfully converted when two organizations had the requirements, possibilities, wishes and significance. With three propositions which were government legitimacy restriction, the function of foundation, and the restriction of foundation capacity, this paper explained the characters of government and foundations, which showed that the condition of successfully conversion had been possessed. On the base of the analysis above, this paper referred to the framework of 'Unsymmetrical Dependence' to explain the relationship between government and foundations. In a word, 'Unsymmetrical Dependence' was the relationship between government and foundations, and the transformation from one resource to another was the inner mechanism of this relationship.

作者徐宇珊

机构地区清华大学公共管理学院

出处《公共管理学报》 CSSCI 2008年第1期33-40,共8页 Journal of Public Management

关键词基金会资源依赖理论非对称性依赖 Foundation Resource-Dependence Theory Unsymmetrical Dependence

分类号 C912.2 [经济管理]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献14

1[2]民政部民间组织管理局,国务院法制办政法司.基金会指南[M].北京:中国社会出版社,2004:88.
2谢宝富.当代中国公益基金会与政府的关系分析[J].中国社会科学院研究生院学报,2003(4):64-69. 被引量：17
3[5]TYMEN J,VANDER P.A Comparative Legal Analysis of Foundations:Aspects of Supervision and Transparency[C]//HELMUT K A,STEFAN T.Private Funds,Public Purpose:Philanthropic Foundations in International perspective[C].New York:Plenum Publishers,1999:55-78.
4[6]STEFAN T.On the Problem of Defining Foundations in a Comparative Perspective[J].Nonprofit Management & Leadership,1999,10(2):215-225.
5[7]ANHEIER,HELMUT K,STEFAN T.Philanthropic Foundations:An International Perspective[C]//HELMUT K A,STEFAN T.Private Funds,Public Purpose:Philanthropic Foundations in International Perspective[C].New York:Plenum Publishers,1999:3-23.
6[8][日]入山映.作为社会现象的基金会[M].田恒,吕永和,倪心一,译.[出版地不详]:世川和平基金会,1996:5-29.
7[9]BULMER M.The History of Foundations in the United Kingdom and the United States:Philanthropic Foundations in Industrial Society[C]//HELMUT K A,STEFAN T.Private Funds,Public Purpose:Philanthropic Foundations in International Perspective[C].New York:Plenum Publishers,1999.
8[11]SEALANDER J.Private Wealth and Public Life[M].London:The Johns Hopkins University Press,1997:96-97.
9[12]ROELOFS J.Foundations and Public Policy:the Mask of Pluralism[M].New York:State University of New York,2003:23-26.
10[14]PFEFFER,SALANICK.The External Control of Organizations:A Resource Dependence Perspective[M].New York:Harper & Row Publishers,1978:258.