期刊文献+

德国和美国基本权解释比较研究 被引量:2

A Comparative Study on the Interpretation of Basic Rights in Germany and the U.S
原文传递
导出
摘要 基本权在宪法中的核心地位以及宪法对基本权规定的抽象简洁性,使得基本权解释成为宪法释义学的核心部分。德国和美国作为当今相对发达的宪政国家,长期以来积累了大量基本权解释的判例,两国对基本权保障的诠释及方法论进行了详细深入的论证,丰富和发展了基本权解释的理论。尽管两国的基本权解释存在一些差异,但两国的释宪者都充当着基本权利卫士的角色,只是殊途同归而已。 The core status of basic rights in the constitution and the abstractness and conciseness of constitutional provisions on basic rights have made the interpretation of basic rights the core of constitutional interpretive jurisprudence. As relatively developed constitutional-government states, Germany and the United States have developed rich case laws on the interpretation of basic rights, made detailed and in-depth demonstration of the interpretation and methodology of the protection of basic rights, and enriched and developed the theory on the interpretation of basic rights. Despite some of their differences, the interpreters of the constitution in these two countries have both played the role of guardians of basic rights, reaching the same goal by different routes.
作者 刘国
出处 《环球法律评论》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第1期57-62,共6页 Global Law Review
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

  • 1(德)卡尔·施米特(CarlSchmitt)著,刘锋.宪法学说[M]上海人民出版社,2005.
  • 2[美]凯斯·R.孙斯坦著,金朝武等.法律推理与政治冲突[M]法律出版社,2004.
  • 3(美)伯纳德·施瓦茨(BernardSchwartz)著,王军等.美国法律史[M]中国政法大学出版社,1990.

同被引文献28

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部