期刊文献+

防护板尺寸对Whipple防护结构撞击损伤影响的实验研究 被引量:2

Effects of bumper lateral size on high-velocity impact damage to Whipple shield
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过高速撞击实验,探讨了采用小尺寸防护板的可行性。实验中采用的Whipple结构由尺寸变化的1mm厚防护板(前板)和尺寸固定的3mm厚舱壁板(后板)组成,防护板与舱壁板间隔10cm。防护板为边长分别为8、12、16和20cm的方形2A12铝合金板,舱壁板为边长为20cm的方形5A06铝合金板。实验过程中均采用直径为4mm的铝合金球形弹丸,撞击速度为1.45~1.71km/s。实验结果表明:Whipple防护结构在舱壁板被击穿的概率大于0.8的条件下和击穿概率为0的条件下的极限速度以及舱壁板临界击穿条件下的速度都与防护板尺寸无关;并且,防护板前后表面击穿孔的直径及击穿孔侧壁的倾斜角也与防护板尺寸无关;但是,在速度相同的条件下随着板尺寸的增大,防护板板面的最大挠度增大,而且,防护板挠曲面的凸凹方向也由单一的凹向变成凸凹方向交替出现;随着速度的增加和板尺寸的增大,防护板最大挠度的增量减小。 On the non-powder two-stage light gas gun facilities, high-velocity impact experiments were carried out to analyze the effects of bumper lateral size on the damage to Whipple shield and explore the feasibility of using bumper whose size is smaller than that of rear wall on Whipple shield in highvelocity impact tests. The configuration of Whipple shields consisted of 1-mm-thickness bumpers and 3-mm-thickness rear wall with 10-cm space between the bumper and the rear wall. The bumpers were 2A12 aluminum square plates with different side lines such as 8, 12, 16 and 20 cm. The rear wall was 5A06 Aluminum square plate with 20-cm side lines. All tests were performed by shooting aluminum projectile 4 mm in diameter at the velocity ranging from 1.45 to 1.71 km/s. Test results show that the mean velocity of 6 projectiles impacting on the Whipple shields is independent of bumper size when the perforation percentage of rear wall was over 80. It is found that the diameters of perforation holes both in front and in back of bumper are independent of bumper size too. However, the deflection on the bumper surface is dependent on bumper size obviously.
出处 《爆炸与冲击》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第1期10-16,共7页 Explosion and Shock Waves
关键词 爆炸力学 尺寸效应 高速撞击 WHIPPLE防护结构 空间碎片 mechanics of explosion size effect high-velocity impact Whipple shield space debris
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Kiureghian A D, Geysekns P V, Khalessi M R. Probabilistic assessment of debris impact damage on orbital structures[J].International Journal of Impact Engineering, 1997,19:571-588.
  • 2Bernhard P P, Christiansen E L, Hyde J, et al. Hypervelocity impact damage into space shuttle surfaces[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 1995,17:57-68.
  • 3Lambert M. Hypervelocity impacts and damage laws[J]. Advancement in Space Research, 1997,19:369-378.
  • 4Cour-Palais B G, Taylor E A, Crew J L. A multi-shock concept for spacecraft shielding[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 1990,10:134-140.
  • 5Christiansen E L, Kerr J H. Ballistics limit equations for spacecraft shielding[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2001,26:93-104.
  • 6Schaefer F, Destefanis R, Ryan S, et al. Hypervelocity impact testing of CFRP/AL honeycomb satellite structures [C]//Proceedings of the Fourth European Conference on Space Debris. Darmstadt, Germany, 2005 : 407-412.
  • 7Nagao Y, Kibe S, Daigo K. H yper velocity impact studies simulating debris collision on composites material[C]//Proceedings of the Fourth European Conference on Space Debris. Darmstadt, Germany, 2005:413-418.
  • 8管公顺,庞宝君,哈跃,张伟.铝合金Whipple防护结构高速撞击实验研究[J].爆炸与冲击,2005,25(5):461-466. 被引量:17

二级参考文献8

  • 1闽桂荣 肖名鑫.防止微流星体击穿航天器舱壁的可靠性设计[J].中国空间科学技术,1986,(6):45-48.
  • 2Christiansen E L, Kerr J H. Ballistics limit equations for spacecraft shielding[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2001,26:93-104.
  • 3Schonberg W P, Williamsen J E. Empirical hole size and crack length models for dual-wall systems under hypervelocity projectile impact[J].International Journal of Impact Engineering, 1997,20:711-722.
  • 4Palmieri D, Faraud M, Destefanis R. Whipple shied ballistic at impact velocity higher than 7 km/s[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2001,26 : 579-590.
  • 5Christiansen E, Lambert M, Stokes H, et al. IADC Protection Manual[Z]. 3rd ed. Germany: Inter Agency Debris Committee, 2002.
  • 6Palmieri D, Schafer F, Hiermaier S, et al. Numerical simulation of non-perforation impacts on shielded gas-filled pressure vessels[J].International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2001,26:591-602.
  • 7张伟,管公顺,庞宝君,邹经湘.航天器空间碎片单护屏防护结构参数优化[J].哈尔滨工业大学学报,2003,35(2):219-221. 被引量:5
  • 8柳森,李毅.Whipple防护屏弹道极限参数试验[J].宇航学报,2004,25(2):205-207. 被引量:23

共引文献16

同被引文献40

引证文献2

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部