期刊文献+

静脉溶栓治疗老年急性心肌梗死患者的体会 被引量:15

Intravenous thrombolytic treatment for acute myocardial infarction in senile patients
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨老年(≥75岁)急性心肌梗死患者静脉溶栓的疗效及安全性。方法将62例老年急性心肌梗死患者随机分为溶栓组和常规治疗组;溶栓组32例,采用尿激酶静脉溶栓加皮下注射小剂量低分子肝素钙。常规治疗组30例,除不用尿激酶及小剂量低分子肝素钙外,其余治疗均与溶栓组相同。结果冠状动脉再通率溶栓组为65.6%(21/32),常规治疗组为16.7%(5/30),两组比较差异具有显著性(P<0.05);溶栓组病死率6.3%(2/32),而常规治疗组病死率为23.3%(7/30),两组比较具有显著差异性(P<0.05);两组无严重出血并发症,出血并发症比较差异无显著性(P>0.05)。结论尿激酶静脉溶栓治疗老年急性心肌梗死可以提高冠状动脉再通率,降低死亡率和改善预后,是可行性治疗措施。 Objective To investigate the intravenous thrombolytic efficacy and safety in senile patients (≥ 75 years of age) with acute myocardial infarction. Methods sixty-two senilez patients with acute myocardial infarction were randomly divided into thrombolytic group and the conventional treatment group;in thrombolytic group 32 patients gave intravenous thrombolytic treatment with urokinase and low-dose subcutaneous injection of low-molecular-weight heparin calcium other 30 cases in the conventional therapy group only routine treatment, The curative and untoward effects in the two groups were observed and compared. Results Coronary artery recanalization in thrombolytic group was 65.6% (21/32), only 16.7%(2/32) in the conventional treatment group,and the difference between the two groups was significant (P 〈0.05), The mortality in thrombolytic group was 6.3% (2 / 32), while the conventional therapy group reached 23.3% (7 / 30)(P 〈0.05), but there was no serious bleeding complications in the two groups (P〉 0.05). Conclusion Intravenous thrombolytic therapy for senile patients with acute myocardial infarction can improve coronary artery recanalization, lower mortality and make the prognosis more better.
作者 邓翠贞
出处 《实用心脑肺血管病杂志》 2008年第2期96-98,共3页 Practical Journal of Cardiac Cerebral Pneumal and Vascular Disease
关键词 静脉溶栓疗法 老年心肌梗死 尿激酶 Intravenous thrombolytic therapy Myocardial infarction Senile patient
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1Antman EM, Anbe DT, Armstrong PW, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction : a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Revise the 1999 Guidelines for the Mangagement of Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction).Circulation, 2004,110(9): 82-292.
  • 2韩雅玲.老年急性心肌梗死的再灌注治疗[J].临床内科杂志,2007,24(1):8-10. 被引量:18
  • 3姚光辉,杨荣平.急性心肌梗死溶栓药物疗效的循证医学评价[J].心血管病学进展,2007,28(1):56-59. 被引量:28
  • 4戚文航,吴立群,主编.急性心肌梗塞的静脉溶栓治疗[M].北京:北京医科大学中国协和医科大学联合出版社,1994.140-146.

二级参考文献39

  • 1ResearchGroupofNationalProject85-915-02-01(Correspondence:FuWaiHospi-tal,CAMS&PUMC,Beijing100037).急性心肌梗塞尿激酶临床应用研究(1138例)[J].中华心血管病杂志,1996,24(3):169-173. 被引量:156
  • 2Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Sopravvivenza nell′Infarto Miocardico (GISSI):Effectiveness of intravenous thrombolytic treatment in acute myocardial infarction[J].Lancet,1986,i:397-402.
  • 3ISIS-2(Second International Study of Infarct Survival) collaborative group:Randomised trial of intravenous streptokinase,oral aspirin,both,or neither among 17 187 cases of suspected acute myocardial infarction:ISIS-2[J].Lancet,1988,ii:349-360.
  • 4Neuhaus KL,Tebbe U,Gottwik M,et al.Intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) and urokinase in acute myocardial infarction:Results of the German Activator Urokinase Study (GAUS)[J].J Am Coll Cardiol,1988,12(3):581-587.
  • 5Vermeer F,Bar F,Windeler J,et al.PASS(Practical Applicability of Saruplase Study).Saruplase,a new fibrin specific thrombolytic agent;final results of the PASS study (1 698 patients)[J].Circulation,1993,88:I-292.
  • 6Tebbe U,Michels R,Adgey J,et al.COMPASS(Comparison trial of Saruplase and Streptokinase).Randomized,double-blind study comparing saruplase with streptokinase therapy in acute myocardial infarction:the COMPASS equivalence trial[J].J Am Coll Cardiol,1998,31:487-493.
  • 7PRIMI(Pro-urokinase In Myocardial Infarction trial) study group.Randomised double-blind trial of recombinant pro-urokinase against streptokinase in acute myocardial infarction[J].Lancet,1989,i:863-868.
  • 8Califf RM,Vandormael M,Grines CL,et al.A randomized trial of late reperfusion therapy for acute myocardial infarction[J].Circulation,1997,85:2090-2099.
  • 9Verstraete M,blelfeld W,brower RW,et al.Double-blind randomised trial of intravenous tissue-type plasminogen activator versus placebo in acute myocardial infarction[J].Lancet,1985,ii:965-969.
  • 10ASSET.Trial of tissue plasminogen activator for mortality reduction in acute myocardial infarction.Anglo-Scandinavian Study of Earty Thrombolysis(ASSET)[J].Lancet,1998,ii:525-533.

共引文献40

同被引文献52

引证文献15

二级引证文献50

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部