期刊文献+

555例羊膜腔穿刺产前诊断临床研究 被引量:25

Clinical study of prenatal diagnosis for chrmonsomal abnoralities by amniocentensis of 555 cases
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的通过羊水细胞染色体核型分析结果,探讨胎儿染色体异常的临床高危因素,进一步提高羊膜腔穿刺对胎儿异常染色体核型的检出率。方法选取2005年2月至2005年10月在北京妇产医院产前诊断中心决定羊膜腔穿刺的555例妊娠18-24周的孕妇,对羊水中胎儿脱落细胞进行培养,采用原位制片、G带染色技术进行染色体分析。结果共15例异常染色体核型。高龄孕妇(年龄≥35岁)与血清筛查高危组胎儿染色体异常的发生率差异无显著性(P=0.600)。但在高龄孕妇中,年龄达到或超过40岁者,胎儿染色体异常的发生率显著增高。虽然父亲的年龄在胎儿染色体正常与异常组间的差异有显著性意义,但在年龄低于35岁的孕妇中,上述差异美有显著性意义。B超提示胎儿"软指标"异常组染色体异常的发生率与未提示异常组的差异有极显著性(P=0.000)。结论血清筛查高危者与高龄孕妇都有进行产前诊断的必要性。对于B超提示胎儿异常者应警惕胎儿染色体异常。 Objective:Detect the clinical high risk factors of fetal chromosomal abnormalities by analysis of karyotypically with amniocentensis,increasing the detect rate of aminiocentensis.Methods:recruiting 555 preganant women during 18 to 24 gestational weeks,besides 5,they have the indication of aminiocentensis include:age is or over 35 years,delivered chromosomal abnormalities baby before,serum screening show high risk,ultrasound "softer marker" abnormal,one of the couple developed chromosomal abnormalities or exposed to harmful environments and getting amniocentensis in The Prenatal Diagnose Center of Beijing Obstetric and Gynecological Hospital,analysis the karyotypically of fetal cast-off cells cultivated by orthotope slice and G band staining technique.Analysis the data by SPSS 11.5 softy ware.Result:There are 15 chromosomal abnormalities,6 18-trisome,6 21-trisome,1 XYY,1 unbanlenced translocation,1banlenced translocation.The incidence of chromosomal abnormalities in serum screening high risk is 2.09%,it is 2.37% in the senior preganant group,no significantly difference of chromosomal abnormalities between the two groupes(P=0.600).The incidence of chromosomal abnormalities increase obviously when the pregnants elder than 40 years.The average of father's age in the chromosomal abnormalities group is about 39 years elder than that in normal chromosomal group 36 years old(P=0.044),but this result is affected by the age of mother,because of excluding senior preganant,the age of father appeared no significant difference during the normal and abnormal chromosomal group.The significantly difference also appeared between the normal and abnormal ultrasound measurement group(P=0.000).The ultrasound "soft marker" considered as abnormal echo in ventricle,intensification of intestine echo,pelviectasis,neck diaphanotheca thickening,choroid plexus cyst,gastric vacuole not appearing etc.There are 20 cases appeared positive soft marker,and 5 are chromosomal abnormalities 23.8%(5/20),the rate of detection higher than that of normal ultrasound group 1.9%(10/524),it is significant difference(P=0.000),same as the difference between the abnormal ultrasound cases and the serum screening high risk group(P=0.0003).Comparing the vaginal bleeding rate of early preganant,no significant difference appeared between the normal and abnormal chromosomal karyotypically groups.Conclusion:Because of the maternal serum β-HCG、AFP level changing with different gestational week,verifing the exact gestational week is very important during serum screening.Ultrasound screening is necessary as early as possible for menstruation irregularis after menolipsis.Both women with serum screening high risk and 35 years of age or older,especially over 40 years should be performed prenatal diagnose.The ultrasound "soft marker" in the second trimester should be concerned as a screening marker.
作者 王欣 黄醒华
出处 《中国优生与遗传杂志》 2008年第5期32-34,共3页 Chinese Journal of Birth Health & Heredity
关键词 产前诊断 染色体核型分析 Prenatal diagnose Karyotypically
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献20

  • 1朱宝生,易淑君,章晓梅,王瑞红.用胰蛋白酶连续进行G、C显带的研究[J].中国优生与遗传杂志,1993,1(2):39-40. 被引量:3
  • 2张忠恕.遗传与遗传保健[J].生殖与避孕,1996,16(1):73-77. 被引量:10
  • 3Van den Hof MC, Wilson RD, Diagnostic Imaging Committee,et al. Fetal soft markers in obstetric ultrasound[ J ]. J Obstet Gynaecol Can,2005,27(6) :592-636.
  • 4Lee MJ, Roman AS, Lusskin S, et al. Maternal anxiety and ultrasound markers for aneuploidy in a multiethnic population[ J]. Prenat Diagn, 2007,27( 1 ) :40-45.
  • 5Roberts D J, Genest D. Cardiac histologic pathology characteristic of triosomies 13 and 21 [ J ]. Hum Pathol, 1992,23 : 1130-1140.
  • 6Smith-Blindman R,HosmerW. Second-trimester ultrasound to detect fetuses with Down syndrome-a meta-analysis [ J ]. JAMA, 2001,285(8) : 1044-1055.
  • 7Anderson N, Jyoti R. Relationship of isolated fetal intracardiac echogenic focus to trisomy 21 at the mid-trimester sonogram in women younger than 35 years [ J ]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2003,21:354-358.
  • 8Ship TD, Bromley B. The frequency of fetal echogenic intracardiac foci with repect to maternal race [ J ]. J Ultrasound Med, 1999,18 (3 Suppl) : S108.
  • 9Wilson RD, Lynch S. Fetal pyelectasis: comparison of postnatal renal pathology with unilateral and bilateral pyelectasis [ J ] . Prenat Diagn, 1997,17:451-455.
  • 10Sohl BD, Scioscia AL. Utility of minor uhrasonographic markers in the prediction of abnormal fetal karyotype at a prenatal diagnosis center[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1999,181(4) :898-903.

共引文献11

同被引文献147

引证文献25

二级引证文献91

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部