3Khan S, Cloud GC, Kerry S, et al. Imaging of vertebral artery stenosis: a systematic review [J]. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychia- try, 2007, 78: 1218-1225.
4Hua Y, Meng XF, Jia LY, et al. Color Doppler imaging evalua- tion of proximal vertebral artery stenosis [J]. AJR, 2009, 193: 1434-1438.
5Alcazar JL, Laparte C. In vivo validation of time domain veloc- ity measurement technique of blood flow in human fetuses [J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 1998, 24 (1): 9-13.
6Johnson TR, Krauss B, Sedlmair M, et al. Material differentiation by dual energy CT: initial experience [J]. Eur Radiol, 2007, 17(6): 1510-1517.
7Deng K, Liu C, Maa R, et al. Clinical evaluation of dual-ener- gy bone removal in CT angiography of the head and neck: comparison with conventional bone-subtraction CT angiogra- nhv [J]. Clin Radiol. 2009.64: 534-541.
8Lell MM, Kramer M, Klotz E, et al. Carotid computed tomography angiography with automated bone suppression: a com- parative study between dual energy and bone subtraction techniques [J]. Invest Radiol, 44(6): 322-328.
9Fujita N, Yamanaka T, Hosoi H. Usefulness of MR angiogra- phy in cases of central vertigo [J]. Auris Nasus Larynx, 2002, 29 (3): 247-252.
10Choi HS, Kim DI, Kim D J, et al. Accuracy of 3 T MR angiography in vertebral artery stenosis and coincidence cerebrovascular steuoses [J]. Neuroradiology 893-898 with other 2010, 52:.
