摘要
传统的城市广场规划设计,多注重服务半径、设计理念等内容,对其服务范围内的人口特征缺乏有效研究,如性别、年龄、家庭结构等,造成广场活力下降。在南京市秦淮、白下两区的随机调查结果显示,在广场大小、广场内部道路设计、治安管理、卫生维护等设计要素上,两性对其的关注程度基本无差异,而在特殊设施、私密空间设计、绿化美学效果等方面,两性间的关注差异明显。基于女性主义思想,这一差异的产生缘于两性在家庭内部分工、空间认知、生活体验、审美、历史角色上的差异。
City square, which is a significant kind of public resources, is an important place for citizens to take outdoor leisure activities. Traditionally, only service radius and design concept is considerably concerned in the design process. But research on the characteristics,such as gender, age and family structure etc. of the population isn＇t enough and this inadequacy makes the square operate inefficiently. The analysis of the issue on city square design in this paper is based on feminism thought,which concerns about the gender difference.
Generally speaking, feminism dated back to the middle of the 18th century and gained its second wave in 1970s. From feminism perspective, a lot of new thoughts come into being in many fields, such as sociology, politics, economics and culture. In foreign countries, from feminism perspective, there are a lot of research productions relating to urban planning and environment design. But systematical research of the city square design from feminism perspective is rare. The idea of feminism traveled into our country in 1950s, and not popular until 1980s. And researches on urban planning and environment design from feminism perspective are only some introductions to feminism geography and feminism planning thought. There are a few papers about relative fields. Research of city square design based on feminism isn＇t seen. And the importance of the square to the female lies in two aspects： one is to play as an important female leisure space, and the other is to make it favorite for the female to subsidize place making. The design-factor of the square is the main point of this research.
According to related literatures, all the design factors can be summarized as seven categories and thirty-one subcategories. The investigation results of the squares of Qinhuai and Baixia District show that there is little concern difference between the two genders in most of the factors. This result implies that as a natural and socialized person, the two genders have many aspects in common. The evident differences distribute dispersively. The details are that the male emphasizes more on private space, human history, and landscape maintenance while the female concerns more about the lay-out, the special facilities, and the aesthetic effect of the green landscape. And these differences are mainly reflections of the domestic labor division, cognitive difference, life experience of the daily life, aesthetic difference and marginalized role of the female in the process of the history.
出处
《人文地理》
CSSCI
北大核心
2008年第4期12-16,50,共6页
Human Geography
