期刊文献+

不同剂型二嗪磷制剂及原药对鸟类的毒性评价 被引量:9

Toxicity Assessment of Different Formulations of Diazinon to Avian
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 运用一次性经口染毒法测定了95%二嗪磷原药、50%二嗪磷乳油、10%二嗪磷颗粒剂对鹌鹑、鹧鸪的急性经口毒性,同时运用饲喂法测定了50%二嗪磷乳油对鹌鹑和鹧鸪的急性饲喂毒性。一次性经口染毒法结果表明,二嗪磷原药及两种制剂对鹌鹑的LD50在4.61 ̄13.9mg·kg-1体重之间,制剂与原药之间存在较大毒性差异,对鹧鸪的LD50在22.39 ̄31.67mg·kg-1体重之间,制剂及原药之间差异不显著。饲喂法结果表明,50%二嗪磷乳油对不同鸟类的饲喂毒性差异显著,对鹌鹑的饲喂毒性为高毒,LC50为120mg·kg-1饲料,对鹧鸪的饲喂毒性为低毒,LC50为1210mg·kg-1饲料。50%二嗪磷乳油用作拌种剂使用时,10%二嗪磷颗粒剂在田间撒施时容易对鸟类造成危害影响。 The short-term risks of pesticides to avian currently are assessed by comparing the LD50 and LC50 determined from the laboratory acute oral toxicity test and dietary toxicity test. This paper assessed the toxicity of different formulations of diazinon to Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica) and hill partridge (A rborophila brunneopectus). Firstly, a rang-finding test was conducted to determine the dosage levels of diazinon to birds in acute oral toxicity test, and then the definitive test was conducted to determine the LD50 of different birds. Duration of definitive test was 7 days, during test periods, all signs of intoxication, other abnormal behavior and mortality were recorded and reported by dosage level and by day. Based on the results of oral toxicity test, the toxicity category of different fomulations of diazinon to birds was educed. In dietary toxicity test, Japanese quail(Coturnixjaponica)and 50% diazinon EC were selected to determine the LC50 .The test period was 8 days, including 5 days of exposure to 50% diazinon EC in the diet (exposure period) followed by at least 3 days of additional observation (post-exposure period) while the test birds are receiving an untreated diet. Mortality and abnormal behavior were recorded throughout the test period. Average body weight and food consumption per day were calculated and recorded. Finally the LC50 were determined by statistical analysis. The results showed that the LD50 of diazinon and its two formulations to Japanese quail was 4.61 -13.9 mg·kg^-1 body weight, and there were significant toxicity differences between the two formulations and diazinon; while, the LD50 to hill partridge was 22.39-31.67 mg·kg^-1 body weight, and there were no significant toxicity differences between the two formulations and diazinon. 50% diazinon EC showed significantly different avian dietary toxicity to different birds, being high toxicity to Japanese quail with LC50 120 mg·kg^-1 fodder and low toxicity to hill partridge with LC50 1 210 mg·kg^-1 fodder. 50% diazinon EC for seed treatment and 10% particulate diazinon for dressing in the field could be harmful to birds.
出处 《农业环境科学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第5期2033-2038,共6页 Journal of Agro-Environment Science
关键词 急性经口毒性 饲喂毒性 鸟类 acute oral toxicity avian dietary toxicity avian
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1刘乾开,朱国念.新编农药使用手册(第二版)[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,2002.24-26.
  • 2Mastrota F N. Wildlife mortality incidents caused by pesticides: analysis of the EIIS database. 1999.
  • 3李富根.二嗪磷的环境问题及管理情况[J].农药科学与管理,2004,25(12):31-33. 被引量:8
  • 4Pimentel D, McLaughlin L, Zeep A,et al. Environment and economic effects of reducing pesticide use in agriculture[J]. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,1993,46:273-288.
  • 5朱忠林,龚瑞忠,韩志华,单正军,蔡道基.农药对鸟类的毒性及其安全性评价[J].农村生态环境,2003,19(3):53-57. 被引量:26
  • 6蔡道基,朱忠林,单正军.建议加强对克百威的环境管理[J].农药科学与管理,1997,18(3):30-32. 被引量:6
  • 7USEPA, Avian Dietary Toxicity Test. OPPTS850.2200, Ecological Effects Test Guidelines, EPA 712-C-96-140 April 1996.
  • 8中华人民共和国农业部.化学农药环境安全评价试验准则.,2004..

二级参考文献11

  • 1陈锐,戴珍科,蔡道基.农药对禽鸟的毒性与评价[J].农村生态环境,1994,10(4):78-80. 被引量:12
  • 2郑允文,蔡道基.克百威对我国东北地区国家重点保护鸟类的危害可能性评估[J].农药科学与管理,1996,17(3):11-15. 被引量:4
  • 3.农药与环境[A].蔡道基.农药环境毒理研究[C].北京:中国环境科学出版社,1999.3-18.
  • 4国家环境保护局.化学农药环境安全评价试验准则[Z].,1989..
  • 5Pimentel D. Techniques for reducing pesticide use---economic and environmental benefits[ M]. New Jersey :John Wiley & Sons Inc. ,1997.
  • 6Mineau P,Baril A,Collins BT,et al. Pesticide acute toxicity reference values for birds [ J ]. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol,2001,170 :13 -74.
  • 7Mastrota FN. Wildlife mortality incidents caused by pesticides:analysis of the EIIS database. 1999.
  • 8American Bird Conservancy. Pesticides and birds campaign [ EB/OL]. http ://www. abcbirds, org/pesticides/.
  • 9Pimentel D, McLaughlin L, Zepp A, et al. Environmental and economic effects of reducing pesticide use in agriculture[ J]. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment, 1993,46:273 - 288.
  • 10USEPA. Office of pesticide programms' label manual[ EB/OL]. http://www, epa. gov/opppapsl/labeling/lrm and Code of Federal Regulations 40 Part 156.

共引文献38

同被引文献125

引证文献9

二级引证文献32

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部