期刊文献+

CT与MRI在直肠癌诊断及术前分期中的价值 被引量:24

Comparative study of CT and MRI in diagnosis and preoperative staging of rectal cancer
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较CT和MRI在直肠癌诊断及术前分期中的价值。方法选择27例经外科手术和病理证实的直肠癌病例,所有病人均于术前进行MRI和CT检查,MRI序列包括常规T1WI、T2WI及快速梯度回波脂肪抑制(FSPGR),CT采用平扫及动态增强扫描。观察肿瘤大小和信号,周围浸润及淋巴结增大情况,将影像观察结果与外科手术和病理诊断结果进行比较。结果T分期对于CT术前分期的准确度为88.9%、MRI为96.2%。CT诊断淋巴结转移的敏感度为24%,特异度为97.6%;MRI诊断淋巴结转移的敏感度为36%,特异度为97.6%。结论在直肠癌术前诊断及分期方面,MRI的作用优于CT。 Objective The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of MRI and CT in the diagnosis and preoperative staging of rectal cancer. Methods 27 patients with rectal cancer proved surgically and histologically between January to December of 2007 were studied. Each'of patients underwent MRI and CT examinations before surgical operation. MRI study included T1WI, T2WI and FSPGR pulse sequences. CT study included plain and contrast enhanced scanning. The size and signal intensity of tumor, surrounding infiltration, and lymph nodes around the rectum were observed. The imaging findings were compared with those from surgery and pathology. Results In the preoperative T staging, the accuracy of CT and MRI were 88.9% and 96.2%, respectively. The specificity of regional lymph node invasion with CT and MRI both were 97.6%; the sensitivity of regional lymph node invasion with CT and MRI were 24% and 36%, respectively. Conclusion MRI was superior to CT in the diagnosis and preoperative staging of rectal cancer.
出处 《国际医学放射学杂志》 2008年第5期326-328,427,共4页 International Journal of Medical Radiology
关键词 直肠癌 诊断 术前分期 体层摄影术 X线计算机 磁共振成像 Rectal cancer Diagnosis Preoperative staging CT MRI
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1[1]毛伟征,苏东明,李雪萍,等.AJCV癌症分期手册[M].第6版.沈阳:辽宁科学技术出版社.2005:113-116.
  • 2高明勇,张永芬,卢瑞梁.无肠道准备直肠癌的MRI诊断和术前分期的价值[J].影像诊断与介入放射学,2004,13(3):177-180. 被引量:20
  • 3[4]Klesaen C,Rogalla P,Taupitz M.Local staging of rectal cancer:the current role of MRI[J].Eur Radioi,2007,17(2):379-389.
  • 4[5]Kim NK,Kim MJ,Park JK,et al.Preoperative staging of rectal cancer with MRI:accuracy and clinical usofulness[J].Ann Surg Oncol,2000,7(10):732-737.
  • 5[6]Taupitz M,Richards CJ,Bourne MW,et al.Morpholngie predictors of lymph node status in tectal Cancer with use of high-spatial-resolution MR imaging with histopatholngic comparison[J].Radiology,2003,227(2):371-377.
  • 6[7]Koh DM,Brown G,Temple L,et al.Rectal cancer:mesorectallymph nodes at MRI imaging with USPIO vemuis histopathlogie findingsinitial observatious[J].Radiology,2004,231(1):91-99.

二级参考文献7

  • 1Brown G, Catherine J, Richards G, et al. Rectal carcinoma:thin- section MR imaging for staging in 28 patients. Radiology,1999, 211:215 -222.
  • 2Hussain SM, Outwater EK, Siegelman ES. Mucinous versus nonmucinous rectal carcinomas: differentiation with MR imaging.Radiology, 1999, 213:79 -85.
  • 3Brown G, Catherine J, Richards G, et al. Morphologic predictors of lymph node status in rectal cancer with use of high- spatialresolution MR imaging with histopathologic comparison, Radiology, 2003, 227:371 -377.
  • 4Thaler W, Watzka S, Martin F, et al. Preoperative staging of rectal cancer by endoluminal ultrasound vs magnetic resonace imaging. Dis Colon Rcetum, 1994,37: 1189.
  • 5卢爱国,周玮,尹华.直肠腔内超声在低位直肠癌术前分期的作用[J].中国内镜杂志,2002,8(3):17-18. 被引量:15
  • 6陈大伟.直肠癌局部侵犯范围的术前判断[J].消化外科,2002,1(3):160-162. 被引量:6
  • 7何炜杰,胡浩,汪良.盆静脉浸润对直肠癌预后的意义[J].中国血液流变学杂志,2002,12(4):303-305. 被引量:1

共引文献19

同被引文献141

引证文献24

二级引证文献159

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部