经尿道等离子双极电切术治疗良性前列腺增生332例报告被引量：13

Transurethral Plasmakinetic Resection of the Prostate for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia:Report of 332 Cases

在线阅读下载PDF

导出

摘要目的探讨经尿道等离子双极电切术治疗良性前列腺增生的安全性和疗效。方法采用英国Gyrus等离子双极电切系统,于6点处开始切除前列腺中叶,然后分别切除两侧叶腺体直至前列腺包膜,切平膀胱颈部,前列腺尖部切至精阜前缘,保留F22三腔导尿管,气囊放置膀胱颈部;术后生理盐水冲洗1～2d,导尿管3～5d拔除。结果332例手术均获成功,手术时间(85·0±12·0)min;术中出血量30～650ml,中位数115·0ml,早期有10例输血200～400ml;无经尿道电切综合征和闭孔神经反射发生。术后发生前尿道炎性狭窄14例,经门诊尿道扩张后治愈;暂时性尿失禁15例,经提肛训练1～3周恢复正常。332例术后随访1～6个月,最大尿流率(Qmax)由术前(7·6±2·4)ml/s升高到术后(22·6±3·4)ml/s(t=13·582,P=0·000);国际前列腺症状评分由术前(27·3±1·5)分降到术后(7·0±1·2)分(t=16·394,P=0·000);生活质量评分由术前(4·3±0·4)分降到术后(2·1±0·8)分(t=9·761,P=0·005)。结论经尿道等离子双极电切是治疗BPH的一种安全有效的方法。 Objective To discuss the efficacy and safety of transurethral plasmakinetic resection of the prostate （PKRP） for benign prostatic hyperplasia （BPH）. Methods A British made Bipolar plasmakinetic resection system （Gyms） was employed in this series. Started from the 6 o＇ clock point, the middle lobe of the prostate was resected, followed by the left and right lobes, which were resected down to the prostate capsule. And then the bladder neck was cut down. The apical tissues were resected to the anterior border of the seminal colliculus. After the operation, a F22 three-channel catheter was indwelled for 3 to 5 days after the operation, and a balloon was place in the bladder neck. Results The procedure was completed successfully in all of the cases with a mean operation time of （85.0±12. 0） min, and a median blood loss 115.0 ml （30 to 650）. Ten patients received blood transfusion during the operation （200 to 400 ml）. No case showed transurethral resection syndrome or obturator nerve reflex. Fourteen patients developed inflammatory stricture of the anterior ureter and was then cured by dilating the urinary tract; 15 cases showed transient urinary incontinence and was cured after pelvic floor muscle training for 1 to 3 weeks. Follow-up was available in the patients for 1 to 6 months, during which the mean Qmax of the patients significantly increased compared to that preoperation [ from （7.6 ± 2. 4） ml/s to （22. 6 ± 3.4） ml/s, t = 13. 582, P = 0. 000） , and the IPSS and life quality score markedly decreased [ from 27.3 ± 1.5 and 4. 3 ±0. 4 to 7.0 ± 1.2 and 2.1 ± 0. 8 ; t = 16. 394 and 9. 761, P = 0. 000 and 0. 005, respectively] Conclusion PKRP is an effective and safe treatment for BPH.

作者郑涛石洪波张雪军周吉门晓炜孙晓松陈斌周飞王锐赵豫刚余志运

机构地区湖北省襄樊市中心医院泌尿外科

出处《中国微创外科杂志》 CSCD 2008年第10期895-897,共3页 Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery

关键词良性前列腺增生经尿道等离子双极电切术经尿道电切综合征 Benign Prostate Hyperplasia Transurethral Plasmakinetic Resection Transurethral resection syndrome

分类号 R699 [医药卫生—泌尿科学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献10

1Borborglu PG, Kane CJ,Ward JF,et al. Immediate andpostoperative complications of transurethral prostatectomy in 1990s. J Urol, 1999, 162 : 1307 - 1310.
2Wasson JH, Reda D J, Bruskewitz RC, et al. A comparison of transurethral surgery with watchful waiting for moderate symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia. The Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group on Transurethral Resection of the Prostate. New Engl J Med, 1995,332:75 - 79.
3潘柏年叶敏.经尿道前列腺切除术[A].见:吴阶平主编.吴阶平泌尿外科学(第2版)[C].济南,山东科学技术出版社,2004.1223-1226.
4戴玉田.前列腺癌的临床表现与诊断[A].吴阶平主编.吴阶平泌尿外科学(第1版)[M].济南:山东科学技术出版社,2004.1074-1083.
5刘定益,顾炯,王健,唐崎,周燕峰,李汝松,祝宇.经尿道等离子体双极电切术治疗前列腺增生[J].临床泌尿外科杂志,2005,20(5):269-270. 被引量：63
6王行环,王怀鹏,陈浩阳,刘久敏,罗耀雄,冯自卫,罗则民.经尿道等离子体双极电切术治疗良性前列腺增生及膀胱肿瘤[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2003,24(5):318-320. 被引量：267
7严志强,王强,宣枫.经尿道等离子体双极电切术治疗前列腺增生症100例[J].中国微创外科杂志,2006,6(8):608-610. 被引量：9
8Starkman JS, Santucci RA. Comparison of bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate with standard transurethral prostatectomy: shorter stay, earlier catheter removal and fewer complications. BJU Int,2005,95:69 - 71.
9张祥华.良性前列腺增生诊断治疗指南.见:那彦群,主编.中国泌尿外科疾病诊断治疗指南.北京:人民卫生出版社,2006.57-58.
10郭闯,李锋,王斌,张力,李旭明,李元仲.经尿道等离子体双极电切治疗前列腺增生[J].临床泌尿外科杂志,2004,19(7):391-392. 被引量：28

二级参考文献18

1Botto H,Lebret T, Barre P, et al. Electrovaporization of prostate with the Gyrus Device. J Endourol,2001,15 : 319-322.
2Ramsey EW. Benign prostatic hyperplasia: a review. Can J Urol,2000,7 : 1135-1143.
3Mebust W, Hohgrewe H, Coeket APC, et al. Transurethral prostectomy: immediate and post operative complication. A comparative study of 13 participating institution evaluating 3 885 patients. J Uro1,1989,141:243-247.
4Virdi J, Kapasi F, Chandrasekar P, et al. A prospective randomized study between transurethral vaporization using plasmakinetic energy and transurethral resection of the prostate. J Urol,2000,163 (4 suppl) :268-269.
5Donovan JL, Peters TJ, Neal DE, et al. A randomized trial comparing transurethral resection of the prostate,laser therapy and conservative treatment of men with symptoms associated with benign pro6tatic enlargement : the CLasP study. J Urol,2000 ,164 :65-70.
6Virdi J,Kapasi F,Chandrasekar P,et al.A prospective randomized study vaporization resection of prostate. BJUbetween transurethral vaporization using plasmakinetic energy and transurethral resection of the prostate. J Urol,2000,163(4 Suppl):268-269.
7Botto H,Lebret T,Barre P,et al. Electrovaporization of prostate with the gyrus device. J Endourol,2001,15:319-322.
8Mebust W,Holtgzewe H,Cocket A P C,et al. Transurethral prostectomy:immediate and post operative complication,A comparative study of 13 participating institution evaluating 3885 patients. J Urol,1989,141:243-247.
9Donovan J L,Peters T J,Neal D E ,et al. A randomized trial comparing transurethral resection of the prostate,laser therapy and conservative largment:the clasp study. J Urol,2000,164:65-70.
10Reich O,Schneede P,Zaak D,et al.Ex-vivo comparison of thehaemostatic properties of standard transurethral resection and transurethral Int,2003, 92:319-322.