期刊文献+

基于灰色关联分析的故障模式危害性决策方法 被引量:9

Decision making method for failure mode criticality based on grey relational analysis
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过考虑产品设计者的设计意图及偏好,计算了各危害性故障模式对危害性理想故障模式的灰关联度,依此对各故障模式危害性进行了排序,克服了传统风险优先数法当RPN值相等或相近时各故障模式危害程度难以比较以及各个风险优先数因子无相对权重的问题.最后以某产品的工艺FMECA分析为例,进行了验证. Based on grey relational analysis, a decision making method for failure mode criticality was proposed. Through analyzing designers' design ideas and preferences, the criticality of each failure mode was ranked according to its grey correlation degree to that of ideal failure mode, which conquered the problems that the criticality of failure mode was difficult to compare when the risk priority numbers were equal or close, and criticality priority factors had no relative weight. Finally, the proposed method was verified by the case of process FMECA on a specified product.
出处 《工程设计学报》 CSCD 北大核心 2008年第5期334-337,共4页 Chinese Journal of Engineering Design
关键词 风险优先数 故障模式影响及危害性分析 灰色关联分析 risk priority number failure mode effects and criticality analysis grey relational analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1康锐,石荣德,王江山,等.GJB/Z1391-2006故障模式、影响及危害度分析指南[S].北京:总装备部军标出版社,2006.
  • 2BOWLES J B. An assessment of RPN prioritization in a failure modes effects and criticality analysis[C]//Proceeding Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium. Tampa, 2003: 380-386.
  • 3SANKAR N R, PRABHU B S. Modified approach for prioritization of failures in a system failure mode and effects analysis[J]. The International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 2001,18(3): 324-335.
  • 4张清亮,魏秋建,李永晃.灰模糊失效模式与效应分析[J/OL].中华管理评论,1998,1(1):1.[2008-04-20].http://cmr.ba.ouhk.edu.hk/cmr/pass1998.htm.
  • 5PILLAY A, WANG J. Modified failure mode and effects analysis using approximate reasoning[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2003, 79 (1): 69-85.
  • 6CHANG C L, LIU P H, WEI C C. Failure mode and effect analysis and grey theory[J]. Integrated Manufac- turing Systems, 2001,4(12) :211-216.
  • 7DAVIDSON G G, LABIB A W. Learning from failures: design improvements using a multiple criteria decisionmaking process[J]. Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2003,217(11): 207-216.
  • 8CHEN J K, LEE Y C. Risk priority evaluated by ANP in failure mode and effects analysis[J]. Quality Tools and Techniques, 2007 : 1-6.
  • 9徐泽水.对方案有偏好的三角模糊数型多属性决策方法研究[J].系统工程与电子技术,2002,24(8):9-12. 被引量:165
  • 10张璐.FMEA在某结构件制造过程中的应用研究[D].北京:北京航空航天大学,2002.

二级参考文献11

共引文献164

同被引文献50

  • 1陈宝山.我国压水堆核电燃料元件的发展[J].原子能科学技术,2003,37(z1):10-14. 被引量:8
  • 2崔文彬,吴桂涛,孙培廷,张余庆.故障模式影响分析方法的整体性与经济性改进[J].大连海事大学学报,2006,32(4):73-76. 被引量:4
  • 3邱菀华.管理决策与应用熵学[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2001..
  • 4Seyed-Hosseini S M, Safaei N, Asgharpour M J. Repfioritization of failures in a system failure mode and effects analysis by decision making trial and evaluation laboratory technique [ J ]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2006,91 ( 8 ) :872 - 881.
  • 5Wang J, Ruxton T, Labile C R. Design for safety of engineering systems with multiple failure state variables[J]. Reliability Engi- neering and System Safety, 1995,50( 3 ) :271 - 284.
  • 6Xu K, eta/. Fuzzy assessment of FMEA for engine systems[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2(102,75( 1 ) :17 -29.
  • 7Chang K H, Cheng C H. Evaluating the risk of failure using the fuzzy OWA and DEMATEL method[J]. Journal of Intelli- gent Manufacturing,2011,22(2) : 113 - 129.
  • 8Bowles John B. An assessment of RPN prioritization in a failure modes effects and criticality analysis[C]. Proceedings of Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, 2003:380 -386.
  • 9GB/T 7826-2012/IEC60812:2006 Analysis techniques for system reliability-procedure for failure mode and effects analysis(FMEA)(系统可靠性分析技术-失效模式和影响分析(FMEA)程序)[S].
  • 10SANKAR N R,PRABH U B S.Modified approach for prioritization of failures in a system failure mode and effects analysis[J].The International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management,2001,18(3):324-335.

引证文献9

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部