期刊文献+

1957年“毛罗对话”版本比较及解读 被引量:1

A Comparison of Different Editions of"Mao-Luo Dialogue"in 1957 and the Interpretation Thereof
原文传递
导出
摘要 早在1957年整风前的全国宣传工作会议期间,毛泽东就曾三次公开回答过"倘若鲁迅活着敢不敢写"的问题,因而在其后反右派斗争期间再次回答这个问题合乎情理。在目前流传的三种"毛罗对话"版本中,贺圣谟版本提到的"顾全大局"四个字至关重要,最能体现毛泽东对鲁迅杂文立场的深刻了解和对知识分子政治态度的深切期盼。在他看来,"凡事有经有权"——鲁迅式杂文是永远需要的,但要站在人民立场上用保护和教育人民的满腔热情来写,这是经,是原则性;而当社会上出现否定党和社会主义的错误言论并使整风转入反右斗争后,原本在开门整风时用来讽刺自己队伍的杂文就不合时宜了,要顾全反右斗争大局,改变讽刺批评对象,这是权,是灵活性。这种思维体现了马克思主义政策策略原理与中国传统"经权"思想的有机结合。 Mao Zedong publicly answered the question'whether Lu Xun would have dared to write if he had lived'three times as early as the time when the National Publicity Working Confer- ence was held before the rectification movement started,so it stood to reason that he answered this question once again during the Anti - Rightist Campaign later.As far as the three editions of'Mao - Luo Dialogue'in circulation now are concerned,the characters'gu quan da ju (taking the inter- ests of the whole into consideration)'in He Shengrno's edition are very important for they most apt- ly embody Mao Zedong's profound understanding of Lu Xun's essays and his ardent expectation of the intellectuals' political attitude.In his view,'everything has its principle and flexibility'.The es- says in Lu Xun's style are always needed,but they must be written keeping to the stand of the peo- ple and for protecting and educating them-this is the principle;but when the wrong opinion ap- peared in the society that negated the Party and socialism and changed the rectification movement to the Anti-Rightist Campaign,essays like those written at the start of open-door rectification to satirize our own ranks were no longer appropriate;then we should take the whole situation of anti - Rightist struggle into consideration and change the objects of satire and criticism-this is the flexi- bility.This way of thinking embodies the organic combination of Marxist tenet of policy and strate- gy with the traditional Chinese thinking of principle and flexibility.
作者 张健
出处 《当代中国史研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第6期88-95,共8页 Contemporary China History Studies
基金 教育部2007年度哲学社会科学研究后期资助项目"整合与变迁--1957--1958年整风运动的政治文化研究"(项目编号07JHQ0039)的阶段性成果之一。
关键词 毛泽东 罗稷南 鲁迅 反右派斗争 “凡事有经有权” Mao Zedong Luo J inan Lu Xun Anti-Rightist Campaign 'everything has its principle and flexibility'
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1陈明远.综述:“1957年毛罗对话”的论辩[J].社会科学论坛,2004(2):81-86. 被引量:2
  • 2范伟.《回到“毛罗对话”的历史情境》,陈明远编.《假如鲁迅活着》,文汇出版社,2003年版,第160页.
  • 3陈焜.《关于毛泽东答罗稷南问--致周海婴先生的一封信》,陈明远编.《假如鲁迅活着》,第19-20页.
  • 4贺圣谟.《“孤证”提供人的补正--对周海婴先生所记述的毛泽东同罗稷南关于鲁迅的谈话的若干补正》,陈明远编.《假如鲁迅活着》,第12页.
  • 5陆幸生.历史不再是“孤证”--<鲁迅与我七十年>一书引发当事人回忆[J].新民周刊,2001,.
  • 6明远.《文化人论辩的规则--谈<文汇读书周报>展开“关于1957年毛罗对话”辩证的经过》,陈明远编.《假如鲁迅活着》,第106-112页.
  • 7方进玉,齐简.《听黄宗英说往事》,李辉主编.《黄宗英自述》,大象出版社,2004年版,第73-74页.
  • 8黄宗英.《我在现场--亲聆毛泽东与罗稷南对话》,李辉主编.《黄宗英自述》,第70-71页.
  • 9.《毛泽东文集》第7卷[M].人民出版社,1999年版.第31页.
  • 10陈焜.《我的伯父罗稷南》,刘瑞琳主编.《老照片》第24辑,山东画报出版社,2002年版,第3页.

共引文献2228

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部