期刊文献+

多西他赛联合表柔比星/比柔比星新辅助治疗乳腺癌临床分析 被引量:20

Effects of neoad juvant chemotherapy of docetaxel combined with and epirubicin or pirarubicin on breast cancer: clinical analysis of 160 cases
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评价多西他赛联合表柔比星(EPI)或比柔比星(THP)新辅助治疗乳腺癌的临床疗效和毒性反应,探讨影响化疗疗效的相关因素。方法2006年3月至2008年4月,160例Ⅱ~Ⅲ期原发性乳腺癌患者在术前接受新辅助治疗,方案为多西他赛联合表柔比星或比柔比星的3周方案,术前化疗2~6个周期,观察近期疗效和毒副反应,分析相关因素与疗效的关系。结果原发病灶临床有效率(RR)为90%(144/160),其中临床完全缓解(CR)为26%(41/160),临床部分缓解(PR)为64%(103/160),疾病稳定(SD)为8%(13/160),疾病进展(PD)为2%(3/160)。术后病理完全缓解(pCR)为7%(11/160),原发病灶完全缓解(tpCR)为2%(1.3/160)。单因素分析结果显示:临床疗效与肿瘤大小、临床分期、是否为三阴性乳腺癌,以及化疗周期有关。肿瘤体积小临床缓解率高,临床分期早肿瘤缓解率高,三阴性乳腺癌肿瘤缓解率高,化疗3周期的肿瘤缓解率明显高于2周期,而与年龄、组织学分级、ER/PR、Her-2等无明显关系。多因素分析显示,临床分期是影响乳腺癌近期疗效的主要因素。常见的毒性反应有:骨髓抑制、脱发、恶心呕吐、口腔溃疡。结论多西他赛联合表柔比星或比柔比星新辅助治疗乳腺癌疗效较好,耐受性可以接受。临床分期是影响乳腺癌近期疗效的主要因素。 Objective To evaluate the effects and toxicity of the neoadjuvant chemotherapy of docetaxel combined with epirubicin or piraubicin on breast cancer, and to investigate the influencing factors of the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Methods 160 patients with stage Ⅱ/Ⅲ breast cancer, all females, aged 47 (22-66), were treated with docetaxel plus epirubicin or piraubicin with 3 weeks as a cycle. Two to six cycles of treatment were given before surgery. The clinical efficacy and toxicity of the treatment were evaluated, and the correlation between the influencing factors and the clinical parameters with treatment response was analyzed. Results The clinical response rate (RR) was 90% (144/160), the complete response (CR) rate was 26% (41/160), the partial response (PR) rate was 64 % (103/160). The stable disease (SD) rate was 8 % (13/160). The progress disease (PD) rate was 2% (3/160), the pathologically complete remission (pCR) rate was 7% (11/160), and the tumor-pathological complete response (tpCR) rate was 2% (1.3/160). Univariate analysis showed that the tumor size, clinical stage, triple negative phenotype might be the meaningful parameters influencing the clinical response. The patients with smaller tumor size, low stage tumor, and being triple-negative were more likely to achieve CR (P =0.0371,0. 0013, and 0. 0019 respectively). Age, histological grading, ER/PR ratio, Her-2 status did not significantly influence the early response. Multivariate analysis showed that the disease stage might be the meaningful factors for better response (P = 0. 0030 ). The major toxic reactions of the therapy included neutropenia, alopecia, nausea, and vomiting. Conclusion The combination neoadjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel and epirubicin or pirarubicin is an effective method to treat breast cancer with tolerable toxicity. The meaningful parameter influencing the early response is clinical stage.
出处 《中华医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第2期87-90,共4页 National Medical Journal of China
基金 全军医药卫生科研基金(06MA245)
关键词 乳腺肿瘤 新辅助化疗 表柔比星/比柔比星 多西他赛 Breast cancer Neoadjuvant chemotherapy Epirubicin/Pirarubicin Docetaxel
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Garces CA, Cance WG. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy of breast cancer. Am Surg, 2004,70 : 565-569.
  • 2Charfare H, Limongelli S, Purushotham AD, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. Br J Surg,2005, 92:14-23.
  • 3Abrial SC, Penault-Llorca F, Delva R, et al. High prognostic significance of residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a retrospective study in 710 patients with operable breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat,2005, 94: 255-263.
  • 4Penault-Llorea F, Cayre A, Bouchet-Mishellany F, et al. Induction chemotherapy for breast carcinoma: predictive markers and relation with outcome. Int J Oncol,2003, 22: 1319-1325.
  • 5Petit T, Wilt M, Velten M, et al. Comparative value of tumor grade hormonal receptors, Ki 67, HER 2 and topoisomerase II alpha status as predictive markers in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy. Eur J Cancer, 2004,40 : 205 -211.
  • 6Gregory RK, Powles TJ, Salter J, et al. Prognostic relevance of CerhB2 expression following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients in a randomized trial of neoadjuvant versus adjuvant chemoendocrine therapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2000,59 : 171 - 175.
  • 7Estevez LG, Guevas JM, Anton A, et al. Weekly docetaxel as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for stage II and III breast cancer: efficacy and correlation with biological markers in a phase II , muhicenter study. Clin Cancer Res,2003 ,9 :686-692.
  • 8Liedtke C, Mazouni C, Hess KR, et al. Response to neoadjuvant therapy and long-term survival in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol,2008 26 : 1275-1281.
  • 9Carey LA, Dees EC ,Sawyer L, et al. The triple negative paradox: primary tumor chemosensitivity of breast cancer subtypes. Clin Cancer Res ,2007,13:2329-2334.
  • 10Honkoop AH, Luykx-de Bakker SA, Hoekman K, et al. Prolonged neoadjuvant chemotherapy with GM-CSF in locally advanced breast cancer. Oncologist, 1999,4 : 106-111.

同被引文献163

引证文献20

二级引证文献166

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部