期刊文献+

困难气道的评估与临床相关性研究进展 被引量:15

Advance in evaluation of difficult airway and clinical dependability
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 临床中困难气道的发生率可能在1%-4%之间,原因大致分为医源性和患者自身因素。常用的困难气道评估方法包括开口度、上下唇咬合实验、甲颏间距、胸颏间距、下颌骨长度、颈部活动度、Mallampati与Comack—Lehane分级法及Wilson综合风险评估法等。另外还可以利用MRI、CT及喉内镜等对困难气道进行正确的评估。但是这些方法在临床上实际应用其阳性率、特异性及敏感度尚存在分歧。怎样才能更准确地对困难气道进行评估仍在不断的探索中。 The incidence rate of the difficult airway may be from 1% to 4% in clinical practice. Usually the cause is roughly divided into iatrogenic and patientself. The difficult airway evaluative methods which are commonly used include mouth opening, upper(lower) lip articulation experiment, thyromental distance, sternomental distance, mandible length, cervical part activity and Mallampti , Comack-Lehane classification and Wilson risk sum score etc. In addition, we still can utilize MRI, CT and laryngendoscope to evaluate the difficult airway. But the masculine rate, specificity and sensitivity of the methods exist disagreement in the clinical service use. How to evaluate the difficult airway more exactly is still being explored.
出处 《安徽医药》 CAS 2009年第3期239-241,共3页 Anhui Medical and Pharmaceutical Journal
基金 安徽省卫生厅应用技术项目(No06B120)
关键词 困难气道 评估方法 临床相关性 difficult airway evaluative methods clinical dependability
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

二级参考文献15

  • 1姜虹,朱也森.气管插管困难综合预测系统的建立[J].中国口腔颌面外科杂志,2004,2(2):73-76. 被引量:13
  • 2曹铭辉,梁建军,吴强.两种预测困难气管插管方法的临床价值评估[J].岭南急诊医学杂志,2004,9(2):108-109. 被引量:7
  • 3[1]Oates JD, Macleod AD,Oates PD,et al. Comparison of two methods for predicting difficult intubation[J].Br J Anaesth,1991,66(3):305-309.
  • 4[3]Cobley M, Vaughan RS.Recognition and management of difficult airway problems[J].Br J Anaesth, 1992,68(1):90-97.
  • 5[4]Mohamed Naguib, FFARCSI. The Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography Imaging and Prediction of Unanticipated Difficult Tracheal Intubation[J].Anesth Analg,2001,92:281-282.
  • 6[5]el-Ganzouri AR,McCarthy RJ,Tuman KJ,et al. Preoperative airway assessment: predictive value of a multivariate risk index[J].Anesth Analg, 1996,82(6): 1197-1204.
  • 7[1]Ezri T,Szmuk P,Warters RD,et al.Difficult airway management practice patterns among anesthesiologists practicing in the United States:have we made any progress?[J].J Clin Anesth,2003,15(6):418-418.
  • 8[2]Mellado PF,Thunedborg LP,Swiatek F,et al.Anaesthesiological airway management in Denmark:assessment,equipment and documentation[J].Acta Anaesthesiol Scand,2004,48(3):350-354.
  • 9[3]Ferson D,Chi TL.Developments in general airway management[J].Thorac Surg Clin,2005,15(1):39-53.
  • 10EBERHART L H,ARNDT C,CIERPKA T,et al.The reliability and validity of the upper lip bite test compared with the mallampati classification to predict difficult laryngoscopy:An external prospective evaluation[J].Anesth Analg,2005,101 (1):284 -289.

共引文献41

同被引文献92

引证文献15

二级引证文献76

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部