期刊文献+

推理与决策的双加工理论研究简评 被引量:16

The Dual-Process Theory of Reasoning and Decision-making
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 决策与推理的双加工理论是一个颇有影响力的理论,通过对两个加工系统的基本特点、区别点以及基本关系、推理错误原因等几个方面进行分析阐述,发现目前在该理论的一些基本问题的认识上还存在诸多问题。主要表现在以下几方面:(1)两个加工系统的关键区别点不在于工作记忆有无绝对参与;(2)对于推理和决策错误的原因,不同的双加工理论给出了不一致的解释;(3)今后有待从情绪与推理决策的关系、影响等方面加深对推理与决策错误的理解。 The dual-process theory is an influential theory in the field of reasoning and decision-making.By analysis from the aspects of the basic characteristics, differences, and the reason of failure in reasoning and decision-making, many problems have been found on the understanding of some basic matters of this theory:(1) The key distinctions between the two systems are not the absolute participation or not of working memory;(2) Different researchers of dual-process theory differently explained the failure of reasoning and decision-making;(3) The understanding of the failure of reasoning and decision-making is awaited by the aspects of the influence and the relationship between emotion and reasoning.
出处 《心理科学进展》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2009年第2期321-324,共4页 Advances in Psychological Science
关键词 推理 双加工理论 冲突监控 reasoning dual-process theory conflict monitor
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1郭秀艳.试析内隐学习的意识-无意识兼容性[J].心理科学,2003,26(6):1015-1019. 被引量:8
  • 2孙彦,李纾,殷晓莉.决策与推理的双系统——启发式系统和分析系统[J].心理科学进展,2007,15(5):721-726. 被引量:149
  • 3Cleeremans, A., & Jimenez, L. (2002). Implicit learning and A graded, dynamical perspective. In: French R M. & Cleeremans, A. (Eds.), Implicit learning and consciousness: An empirical, philosophical and computational consensus in the making (1-40). Hove: Psychology Press.
  • 4Epstein, S., Pacini, R. (1999). dual-process theories from Some basic issues regarding the perspective of cognitive --experiential theory. In Chaiken, S., Trope, Y., (Editors), Dual Process Theories in Social Psychology, Guilford Press, New York, 462-482.
  • 5Evans, J. S. B. T. (1996). Deciding before you think: Relevance and reasoning in the selection task. British Journal of Psychology, 87, 223-240.
  • 6Evans, J. S. B. T. & West, R. F. (2002). Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 645-726.
  • 7Evans, J. S. B. T. (2006). The heuristic-analytic theory of reasoning: Extension and evaluation. Psychonomic Bulletin Review, 13, 378-395.
  • 8Evans, J. S. B. T. (2007). On the resolution of conflict in dual process theories of reasoning. Thinking and Reasoning, 12, 123-145.
  • 9Evans, J. S. B. T. (2008). Dual-Processing Accounts of Reasoning, Judgment, and Social Cognition. Annual Review Psychology, 59, 255-278.
  • 10Frenseh, P. A., Buchner, A., & Lin, J. (1994). Implicit learning of unique and ambiguous serial transition in the presence and absence of a distraction task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 567-584.

二级参考文献58

  • 1A.S. Reber. Implicit Learning and Tacit Knowlodge: An Essay on the Cognitive Unconscious. New York: Oxford University Press. 1993,1 - 50:88 - 123.
  • 2Frensch, P A One concept, multiple meanings: On how to define the concept of implicit learning. Handbook of Implicit Learning, Sage Publications, Inc. 1998.
  • 3Arvidson, P S . Transformations in consciousness:Continuity, the self, and marginal consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 2000,7 (3) :3 - 26.
  • 4McDaniel M. A, Einstein GO. Strategic and automatic processes in prospective memory retrieval: a multiprocess framework. Applied cognitive psychology, 2001,4:127 -144.
  • 5Shanks D R , & St. John, M F Characteristics of dissociable human learning systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1994,17:367 - 447.
  • 6Reber, A S , Kassin,S.M., Lewis,S. Cantor,G. W. On the relationship between implicit and explicit modes in the learning of a complex rule structure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory ,1980,6:492 - 502.
  • 7Broadbent, D. E. Levels, hierarchies, and the locus of control. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1977,29:181 - 201.
  • 8Lewicki, P. Nonconscious social information processing.Orlando, FL: Academic Press. 1986.
  • 9Lewicki, P., Hill, T., & Czyzewska, M. Hidden covariation detection: A fundamental and ubiquitous phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, memory and Cognition, 1997,23:221 - 228.
  • 10Nissen, M J , & Bullemer, P Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures.Cognitive Psychology, 1987,19:1 - 32.

共引文献155

同被引文献380

引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部