期刊文献+

Robust Collaborative Optimization Method Based on Dual-response Surface 被引量:5

Robust Collaborative Optimization Method Based on Dual-response Surface
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 A novel method for robust collaborative design of complex products based on dual-response surface (DRS-RCO) is proposed to solve multidisciplinary design optimization (MDO) problems under uncertainty. Collaborative optimization (CO) which decomposes the whole system into a double-level nonlinear optimization problem is widely accepted as an efficient method to solve MDO problems. In order to improve the quality of complex product in design process, robust collaborative optimization (RCO) is developed to solve those problems under uncertain conditions. RCO does optimization on the linear sum of mean and standard deviation of objective function and gets an optimal solution with high robustness. Response surfaces method is an important way to do approximation in robust design. DRS-RCO is an improved RCO method in which dual-response surface replaces system uncertainty analysis module of CO. The dual-response surface is the approximate model of mean and standard deviation of objective function respectively. In DRS-RCO, All the information of subsystems is included in dual-response surfaces. As an additional item, the standard deviation of objective function is added to the subsystem optimization. This item guarantee both the mean and standard deviation of this subsystem is reaching the minima at the same time. Finally, a test problem with two coupled subsystems is conducted to verify the feasibility and effectiveness of DRS-RCO. A novel method for robust collaborative design of complex products based on dual-response surface (DRS-RCO) is proposed to solve multidisciplinary design optimization (MDO) problems under uncertainty. Collaborative optimization (CO) which decomposes the whole system into a double-level nonlinear optimization problem is widely accepted as an efficient method to solve MDO problems. In order to improve the quality of complex product in design process, robust collaborative optimization (RCO) is developed to solve those problems under uncertain conditions. RCO does optimization on the linear sum of mean and standard deviation of objective function and gets an optimal solution with high robustness. Response surfaces method is an important way to do approximation in robust design. DRS-RCO is an improved RCO method in which dual-response surface replaces system uncertainty analysis module of CO. The dual-response surface is the approximate model of mean and standard deviation of objective function respectively. In DRS-RCO, All the information of subsystems is included in dual-response surfaces. As an additional item, the standard deviation of objective function is added to the subsystem optimization. This item guarantee both the mean and standard deviation of this subsystem is reaching the minima at the same time. Finally, a test problem with two coupled subsystems is conducted to verify the feasibility and effectiveness of DRS-RCO.
出处 《Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering》 SCIE EI CAS CSCD 2009年第2期169-176,共8页 中国机械工程学报(英文版)
基金 supported by National Hi-tech Research and Development Program of China (863 Program, Grant No. 2006AA04Z160) National Key Technology R&D Program (Grant No. 2006BAF01A01) National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 60474059) Pre-Research Foundation of Military Equipment of China
关键词 multidisciplinary design optimization robust design dual-response surface multidisciplinary design optimization, robust design, dual-response surface
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1NATALIA Alexandrov, SR1NIVAS Kodiyalam. Initial results of MDO method evaluation study[R]. Reston: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 1998: AIAA-98-4884.
  • 2JOSEPH P Giesing, JEAN-FRANCOIS M B. A summary of industry MDO applications and needs[R]. Reston: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 1998: AIAA-98-4737.
  • 3WAKAYAMA S. Subsonic wing design using multidisciplinary optimization[R]. Reston: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 1994: AIAA-94-4409.
  • 4DIEDRICH A, HILEMAN J, TAN D, et al. Multidisciplinary design and optimization of the silent aircraft[R]. Reston: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2006: AIAA 2006-1323.
  • 5SRINIVAS Kodiyalam. Evaluation of methods for multidisciplinary design optimization (MDO) (Part Ⅰ)[R]. Virgjnia: NASA, 1998: NASA/CR- 1998-208716.
  • 6SRINIVAS Kodiyalam, CHARLES Yuan. Evaluation of methods for multidisciplinary design optimization (MDO) (Part Ⅱ), NASA/CR-2000-210313 [R]. Virgjnia: NASA, 2000.
  • 7SU J, RENAUD J E. Automation differentiation in robust optimization[R]. Reston: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 1997: AIAA 1072-1079.
  • 8GU Xiaoyu. Uncertainty in simulation based multidisciplinary design optimization[D]. Fremantle: The University of Notre Dame, 2003.
  • 9DU Xiaoping, CHEN Wei. An efficient approach to probabilistic uncertainty analysis in simulation-based multidisciplinary design[R]. Reston: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2000: AIAA 2000-0423.
  • 10BOX G E P, WILSON K B. On the experimental attainment of optimum conditions[J]. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, 1951, 13: 1-45.

同被引文献51

引证文献5

二级引证文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部