摘要
社会性规制是以消除外部性和内部性方面的市场失灵为主要理论依据的。但是,市场失灵仅是规制的必要而非充分条件,规制、私法与市场机制本身都可能用来消除外部性和内部性问题,而规制并不能证明必然比后两者更为有效。因此,有必要对三者纠正市场失灵的效果进行权衡以找到其合理的替代边界。同时,三者之间往往还是相互依存相互补充的。当前,社会性规制理论研究中存在的最大问题是重视具体行业分析,忽略整体理论研究。社会性规制理论有三种研究趋势值得关注,即经济学的成本收益分析方法、委托代理分析方法和制度主义分析方法。
Social regulation takes the elimination of external and internal market failure as its theoretical basis. However, market failure is not a sufficient condition but necessary one, and regulation, private law and market mechanism all can eliminate the externalization and internalization, but regulation is more efficient than the latter, so it is necessary to balance their effect of rectifying market failure and find a rational substitute margin. At the same time, these three factors are always mutually dependent and supplementary. At present, the problem in studying regulation theory is overemphasis of each industry and neglect of studying the whole theory. There are three trends that deserve our attention, that is, cost - benefit analysis method in economics, principalagent analysis method and institutionalism analysis method.
出处
《学术交流》
CSSCI
北大核心
2009年第4期139-142,共4页
Academic Exchange
关键词
社会性规制
外部性
内部性
social regulation
externalization
internalization
