摘要
吉登斯、U.贝克与Z.鲍曼构成1990年代以降西方社会理论界的三驾马车,他们分别从解放政治、决策缺陷与秩序追求三个视角达成反思性的共识,即西方现代内蕴的政治悖谬在全球化进程中愈发凸显,将代之以新的政治形式。他们各自编织生活政治、亚政治和共和政治的新图景。三者在共识基础上的差异形成一种彼此互补性的关联,即吉登斯的民族国家立场、U.贝克的世界主义方法论和Z.鲍曼的后民族国家视野。
Giddens,Beck,and Bauman,forming the three-horsed chariot in the Western social theoretical world since the 1990s,have reached a reflective consensus separately from the perspectives of emancipatory politics,defected decision,or order pursuit:The inherent political paradoxes in Western modernity are becoming more overt in the age of globalization and will be replaced by some new political forms.They each have depicted the new future of life politics,sub-politics,and republic politics.The main differences in the three concepts are:Giddens investigates the dilemma and future of modernity from the paradox of Enlightenment rationality;Beck reveals the increasing risks in contemporary society from the antinomy of Science,and Bauman criticizes the modernity problems from the vision of Anti-rationalism.Their differences on the basis of consensus have produced complementary relations between Giddens' nation-state standpoint,Beck's cosmopolitan methodology,and Bauman's post-nation-state vision.This is a triangle prism for us to think about the contemporary Western modernity problems.
出处
《社会》
CSSCI
北大核心
2009年第3期133-145,共13页
Chinese Journal of Sociology
