期刊文献+

脑膜瘤的临床病理分型及预后因素分析 被引量:1

Clinicopathological Classification and Prognostic Factors of Meningioma
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨脑膜瘤的临床病理分型及影响预后的因素。方法:用WHO新近的良性、不典型性和恶性脑膜瘤分类,分析116例脑膜瘤临床和病理表现。结果:此分类与脑膜瘤复发、生存时间等预后密切相关,实用性强。患者4、5、8、10年生存率分别为71.4%,55.6%,45.9%和37.4%,手术复发率为20.7%,50.9%有后遗症,13.5%尤重。复发与手术级别密切相关。结论:Cox模型单因素和多因素分析,病理分类、肿瘤发生部位是影响预后的主要因素,手术级别为间接因素。 On the basis of WHO classification of benign,atypical and malignant meningiomas, the clinicopathological features of 116 cases of meningiomas were studied. It was found that the WHO classification could be used with pretty high  applicability as far as recurrence, survival time, longterm curative result of  surgery were concerned as confirmed by COX model analysis. It was also noted that recurrence was closely related to the extent of the surgery, additionally, the histological type and the site of the tumor were the main factors which affected the prognosis of the tumor by COX model single and multiple factor analysis. CT findings were in good harmony with those of the pathology as evidenced by the clinical data.
出处 《中国肿瘤临床》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 1998年第5期349-351,共3页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology
基金 成都军区科研基金
关键词 脑膜瘤 病理分型 预后 COX模型分析 Meningioma Histological classification Prognosis COX model analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1史玉泉,中华神经外科杂志,1993年,9期,125页
  • 2Chen W Y,Cliniconeuropathol,1992年,9期,74页
  • 3潘传敬,中华病理学杂志,1992年,21卷,224页
  • 4张剑中,中华神经外科杂志,1991年,7期,222页
  • 5梁治矢,中华神经外科杂志,1990年,6期,5页
  • 6骆福添,人民卫生统计,1987年,59页

同被引文献14

  • 1[1]Gonzales M. The 2000 World Health Organization classification of tumors of the nervous system. J Clin Neurosci, 2001,8(1):1~3.
  • 2[2]Kleihues P, Burger PC, Scheithaue BW. Histological typing of tumors of the central nervous system. 2nd ed, Berlin:Spring Verlag, 1993.
  • 3[3]Niedermayer L, Kolles H, Leiden W. Classification and grading of gliomas and meningiomas. Radiologe, 1998,38(11):888~97.
  • 4[5]Goyal LK, Suh JH, Mohan DS, et al. Local control and overall survival in atypical meningioma: a retrospective study. Int J Badiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2000,46(1):57~61.
  • 5[6]Izycka SE, Rzepko R, Boriwsk Lj, et al. Recurrent meningioma the immunohistochemical analysis of angiogenesis and cellular proliferation. Preliminary study. Folia Neuropathol, 1999,37(3):179~84.
  • 6[7]Perry A. Scheithaure BW, Stafford SL, et al. Malignancy in meningiomas: a clinicopathologic study of 116 patients with grading implications. Cancer, 1999, 85(9):2046~56.
  • 7[8]Perry A, Stafford SL, Scheithauer BW, et al. Meningioma grading: An analysis of histologic parameters. Am J Surg Pathol, 1997,21(12):1455~65.
  • 8[9]Mirimanoff RO, Dosovetz DE, Linggood RM. Meningioma: analysis of recurrence and progression following neurosurgical resection. J Neurosurg, 1987,62:18~21.
  • 9[10]Maier H, Ofner D, Mittmair A. Classic atypical and anaplastic meningiomas three histopathological subtype of clinical relevance. J Neurosurg, 1992,77:616~8.
  • 10[11]Chen WY, Liu HC, Wong XM. Atypical (anaplastic) meningioma relationship between histologic features and recurrence, a clinicopathological study. Cliniconeuropathol, 1992,9:74~6.

引证文献1

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部