摘要
目的比较牙列末端游离缺损的患者对卡环可摘局部义齿和冠外附着体义齿两种修复方式的主观评价。方法选择20例下颌牙列末端游离缺损的患者,每个患者分别在卡环可摘局部义齿和附着体义齿修复后,通过问卷调查,比较两种修复方式的修复效果。结果在咀嚼功能、固位稳定和美观方面,附着体义齿明显好于传统可摘局部义齿,在发音和舒适方面二者差异无统计学意义,在取戴方面传统卡环可摘局部义齿明显优于精密附着体义齿。结论对于牙列末端游离缺损的患者,与传统可摘局部义齿相比,冠外附着体义齿修复能更好地满足患者需求,提供良好的修复效果。
Objective To compare the patient＇s subjective evaluation on the attachment dentures and the clasp dentures. Methods Followed up 20 mandibular distal-extension cases, to survey the patient＇ s attitudes after repaired with attachment dentures and clasp dentures through questionnaires. Results Regarding to the masticatory function, fixedness, stabilization and beauty, there were significant different between the attachment dentures and the clasp dentures ;regarding to the pronunciation and comfort, the clasp dentures is better than the attachment dentures. Conclusion Compare with the tradition removable partial dentures, the attachment dentures obtain better restore effect to distal-extension defect.
出处
《四川医学》
CAS
2009年第6期791-793,共3页
Sichuan Medical Journal
基金
四川省卫生厅科技基金项目(编号:030039
060102)
关键词
附着体义齿
游离缺损修复
主观评价
attachment dentures
distal-extension prosthesis
subjective evaluation
