摘要
美国判例法中的最密切联系原则源自法院冲破传统冲突法樊篱和实现个案公平的需要。基于分割方法分析相关法域的"政府利益",是界定"最密切"与否的通常做法,晚近的涉外侵权判例法逐渐将该原则具体化为规则。最密切联系原则在《冲突法重述(第二次)》和里斯教授的冲突法思想中只是一种过渡性方案,其实里斯更侧重于政策分析和规则细化。美国权威学者大多对最密切联系原则持批评态度。
The establishment of the doctrine U.S. cases law is the result of breaking the barriers justice in individual cases. It is the common ship＂ by evaluating ＂governmental interests＂ of ＂the most significant relationship＂ in the of traditional conflict of laws and of achieving practice to in relevant doctrine has evolved into rules in recent tort cases approach in the Second Restatement of Conflict of with Laws determine ＂ the most significant relation- jurisdictions on the base of dépecge. The foreign elements. It is just a transitional and in Professor Reese＇ s theory on conflict of laws. In fact, Reese lays more emphasis on policy analysis and development of detailed rules. The doctrine has drawn criticisms from the majority of authoritative scholars in the U. S.
出处
《环球法律评论》
CSSCI
北大核心
2009年第4期69-80,共12页
Global Law Review
基金
许庆坤主持的中国法学会2008年部级法学研究课题"美国‘冲突法革命’的法理及其对中国的启示"(课题编号:D08042)的阶段性研究成果
