期刊文献+

教育增值评估的实证研究——以江西省上饶市30所高级中学语文学科的评估为例 被引量:9

Practical Studies on Value-Added Assessment of School Effects——Based on Chinese Learning of 30 Senior High Schools from Shangrao City
原文传递
导出
摘要 教育增值评估在控制学生背景因素的基础上评价学校效能。是教育评价方法中一种较为有效的评价方法。对上饶市30所高级中学语文学科的增值评估结果显示:增值分与原始分的评价结果有显著差异。公办学校与民办学校的效能有显著差异,重点学校与非重点学校的效能有显著差异。学校对不同性别的学生没有显著的效能差异,但对不同学习能力水平的学生有显著的效能差异。 As one of the methods of assessing school performance, value-added assessment is accepted better than any of the others so far as its reasonability is concerned. In this research, with the sample data gathered from 30 senior high schools in Shangrao city, school effectiveness is measured on the basis of students' gains, implicitly controlling for some background factors that influence initial levels of achievement. As a result, a conclusion will be reached: The result of value-added measures is quite different from that of students' scores from the current year. In the meanwhile, Different types of schools have different school effectiveness.For students of different gender there is no significant difference in school performance.However, there is a significant difference in performance on different levels of learning ability of students.
机构地区 江西师范大学
出处 《中国考试》 2009年第9期3-9,共7页 journal of China Examinations
关键词 学校效能 教育评价 增值 School Effect Educational Evaluation Value-added
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献30

  • 1学校效能研究与教育过程评价[J].教育研究,1996,17(7):59-64. 被引量:17
  • 2David Reynolds and Peter Cuttance. School Effectiveness: Research,Policy and Practice [M]. London:Cassell, 1992.
  • 3Scheerens, J (1990). School effectiveness research and the development of process indicators of school functioning,School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 1,(1):61-80.
  • 4Thomas, S. (2001). Dimensions of Secondary School Effectiveness: Comparative Analyses Across Regions.School Effectiveness and School Improvement 12 (3) : 285-322.
  • 5Goldstein, H (1993). Assessment and Accountability,Education, 183, (3): 33-34.
  • 6Sammon.s, P, Thomas, S & Mortimore, P (1997).Forging Links: Effective Schools and Effective Departments,London: Paul Chapman, ISBN 1-85396-349-6.
  • 7Thomas, S (1998). Value Added Measures in School Effeetiveness in the United Kingdom, Prospects, 28. (1): 91-108.
  • 8Goldstein, H (1995). Multilevel Statistical Models, second edition. Kendall's library of statistics 3. London, Sydney,Auckland: Edward Arnold.
  • 9Goldstein, H (1997). Methods in School Effectiveness Research, School Effectiveness & School Improvement, 8, (4)369-395.
  • 10Thomas, S, Sarnmons, P, Mortimore, P & Smees, R(1997). Stability and consistency in secondary schools' effects on students" GCSE outcomes over 3 years, .School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 8, (2): 169-197.

共引文献162

同被引文献80

引证文献9

二级引证文献79

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部