摘要
本研究采用序列反应时任务,通过两个实验比较了主观测量标准和加工分离程序的逻辑两种不同的知识意识性测验方式,结果发现:(1)在两个实验中,被试均习得了序列结构,表现为随着序列学习的进行被试的反应时有所下降,符合规则的刺激(或序列)的反应时显著小于不符合规则的刺激(或序列);(2)主观测量标准在考察序列学习过程中所获得的序列知识是否有意识或无意识参与具有很大优势,而加工分离程序的逻辑能够准确地区分出被试习得的外显知识,并且该逻辑的前提认为任何一种学习方式都是内隐学习和外显学习的结合物,极具包容性,但在区分内隐知识上遇到了较大的困难,因此可以考虑将二者结合使用。
The present study made a comparison between subjective measures and process dissociation procedures, using SRT tasks in two experiments. The results are as follows： （1） The overall RT tended to decline and the RT of standard （regular） stimuli was shorter than the RT of deviant （random） stimuli, which indicated that the participants had learned the sequential structure. （2） Subjective measures bad a superiofityy in the consciousness and unconsciousness in sequence learning, while the process dissociation procedure which has a more inclusive premise could distinguish explicit knowledge precisely but failed to set implicit knowledge apart. Therefore, the two methods could be combined.
出处
《心理科学》
CSSCI
CSCD
北大核心
2009年第6期1373-1376,共4页
Journal of Psychological Science
关键词
序列学习
主观测量标准
加工分离程序
sequence learning, subjective measures, process dissociation procedure
