期刊文献+

广域测量系统通信主干网的风险评估 被引量:28

Risk Assessment of Backbone Communication Network in WAMS
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 根据电力系统中广域测量系统(wide area measurement system,WAMS)通信主干网的自愈环形结构特点,以一个具代表性的4节点2纤双向通道环网为例,通过定性分析和定量计算相结合,提出了WAMS通信主干网的风险评估模型和计算方法。该模型将风险评估涉及的资产、威胁、脆弱点和风险影响4大要素有机融合。采用可靠性分析方法计算出风险事件发生的概率,借鉴层次分析法中构建比较判断矩阵实现风险影响值的量化计算,从而得出通信主干网的风险综合值。计算结果表明所提出的方法具有良好的实用性和可操作性,可用于后续的评估工作,并为电力系统制定安全保护策略提供了依据。 A mathematical model for risk assessment to communication backbone networks (CBN) in wide area measurement system (WAMS) was proposed. Considering the self-healing and ring structure characteristics of CBN, this paper gave a theoretical analysis to the model based on a typical ring network with 4 nodes and 2 optic fibers and double-direction, dual-passage through integrating qualitative and quantitative analysis. This model combined the four main factors of risk assessment together: assets, threats, vulnerabilities and risk impact. In order to get the final comprehensive risk value, the risk events probability and the risk impact value were calculated by reliability analysis and a comparison matrix which is borrowed from analytic hierarchy process (AHP), respectively. The results show that the method has a good operability and practicality, which can be used for follow-up assessment, and provides a basis to establish the security strategy for power systems.
出处 《中国电机工程学报》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2010年第4期84-90,共7页 Proceedings of the CSEE
基金 国家重点基础研究发展计划项目(973项目)(2004CB217908)~~
关键词 广域测量系统 通信主干网 风险评估 可靠性 层次分析法 wide area measurement system (WAMS) communication backbone network (CBN) risk assessment reliability analytic hierarchy process (AHP)
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1姜廷刚,高厚磊,刘炳旭.适合广域测量系统的通信网探讨[J].电力系统及其自动化学报,2004,16(3):57-60. 被引量:19
  • 2Tong Xiaoyang, Liao Guodong, Wang Xiaoru, et al. The analysis of communication architecture and control mode of wide area power systems control[J]. Autonomous Decentralized Systems, 2005(4): 59-65.
  • 3Begovic M, Novosel D, Karlsson D, et al. Wide area protection and emergency control[J]. Proceedings of the IEEE Energy Infrastructure Defense Systems, 2005, 93(5): 867-891.
  • 4Yang Y L, Shyu W H, Lin C H, et al. Risk management of international transportation of integrated circuit products[J]. The Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, 2006(6): 3386-3400.
  • 5赵建立,高会生.光纤保护通道可靠性评估[J].电力系统通信,2007,28(6):5-8. 被引量:6
  • 6Li Wenyuan. Risk assessment of power systems: models, methods,and applications[M]. New York: IEEE Press and Wiley & Sons, 2005: 23-25, 58-74.
  • 7Hussein J A, Majeed A R. Reliability study of regional power network communication[C]. IEEE PES Transmission & Distribution Conference and Exposition, Latin America, Caracas, Venezuela, 2006.
  • 8冯萍慧,连一峰,戴英侠,鲍旭华.基于可靠性理论的分布式系统脆弱性模型[J].软件学报,2006,17(7):1633-1640. 被引量:31
  • 9Dacfey D, Martin N, Thomas V H, et al. Security for industrial communication systems[]J. Proceeding of the IEEE, 2005, 93(6): 1152-1177.
  • 10Howard J D, Longstaff T A. A common language for computer security incidents[R]. Albuquerque, New Mexico and Livermore, California: Sandia National Laboratories, 1998.

二级参考文献79

共引文献217

同被引文献279

引证文献28

二级引证文献382

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部