摘要
目的观察针刀治疗紧张型头痛的临床疗效。方法将60例紧张型头痛患者随机分为治疗组30例和对照组30例。治疗组采用针刀治疗,对照组采用电针治疗,4个疗程后进行疗效评定。结果治疗组治愈21例,显效7例,好转2例,无效0例,愈显率为93.3%;对照组治愈16例,显效6例,好转8例,无效0例,愈显率为73.3%;两组愈显率比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05),治疗组治愈时间短于对照组(P<0.05)。结论针刀治疗紧张型头痛疗效显著,临床愈显率及治愈时间优于电针治疗。
Objective To investigate the clinical effect of knife needle therapy on tension headache. Method Sixty patients with tension headache were randomly allocated to a treatment group of 30 cases and a control group of 30 cases. The treatment group received knife needle therapy and the control group, electroacupuncture. The therapeutic effects were evaluated after four courses of treatment. Results Of the treatment group, cure occurred in 21 cases, marked efficacy in 7 cases, improvement in 2 cases and inefficacy in 0 case, with a cure and marked efficacy rate of 93.3%. Of the control group, cure occurred in 16 cases, marked efficacy in 6 cases, improvement in 8 cases and inefficacy in 0 case, with a cure and marked efficacy rate of 73.3%. There was a statistically significant difference in the cure and marked efficacy rate between the two groups （P〈0.05）. The time for a cure was shorter in the treatment group than in the control group （P〈0.05）. Conclusion Knife needle therapy has a marked effect on tension headache. The clinical cure and marked efficacy rate is higher and the time for a cure is shorter as compared with electroacupuncture.
出处
《上海针灸杂志》
2010年第3期161-162,共2页
Shanghai Journal of Acupuncture and Moxibustion
关键词
针刀
电针
紧张型头痛
Knife needle
Electroacupuncture
Tension headache
