期刊文献+

医疗纠纷因果关系鉴定92例分析 被引量:5

Casuality Analysis of Appraisement of 92 Medical Tangle Cases
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨医疗纠纷因果关系鉴定案例的特点及医疗过失参与度的评定原则。方法从患者一般情况、涉及医院及科室、医疗过失情况及参与度等方面对2003-2008年受理的92例医疗纠纷因果关系鉴定案例进行统计分析。结果患者年龄以30-39岁(29.3%)和0-9岁(25%)最为多见,其次为50-59岁(15.2%);主要涉及科室依次为产科(23.9%)、外科(20.7%)、儿科(15.2%)、内科(14.1%);医疗行为无明显不当者11例(12%),有不当或过失者81例(88%)。结论该结果对医疗纠纷的防范及法医学司法鉴定有重要作用。 Objective To explore the characteristics of appraisement of medical tangles and the evaluation principles of contributed degree of medical negligences. Methods Statistical analysis of 92 medical tangles treated during 2003 to 2008 was performed on the basis of patients' general information,hospital and departments involved,medical negligence as well as its contributed degree and so on. Results The most common patient's age groups were those ranging from 30 to 39 years old(29.3%) and from 0 to 9 years old(25%),the next was that from 50 to 59 years old(15.2%);mainly involved divisions in turn were department of obstetrics(23.9%),surgery(20.7%),department of pediatrics(15.2%),and medical department(14.1%);there were 11 cases(12%) of medical treatment without obvious improper behavior,and 81 cases(88%) with improper behavior or negligence. Conclusion These results have great effects upon prevention of medical tangles and medicolegal expertise.
出处 《河南科技大学学报(医学版)》 2010年第1期70-71,共2页 Journal of Henan University of Science & Technology:Medical Science
关键词 医疗纠纷 医疗过失 参与度 法医学鉴定 medical tangle medical negligence contributed degree medicolegal expertise
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献20

  • 1谢永林,颜师贤.我国健康保险发展策略[J].保险研究,2004(9):45-47. 被引量:2
  • 2陈溪萍,陶陆阳,刘兴本,刘技辉,郑传斐.480例活体损伤的法医学鉴定分析[J].中国法医学杂志,2005,20(1):8-10. 被引量:6
  • 3[1]张新宝.中国侵权行为法(九)[EB/OL].http://www.1488.com/china/Intolaws/lawpont/Default.asp?program,2202-11-25.
  • 4[3]Pendery JF,McCaskill SM, Casada HA.Causation-Getting there from here[EB/OL]. http://www.godwingruber.com/PDF/CausationArticle.pdf. 2000-07-20.
  • 5[4]Negligence Notes Law. Introduction to negligence[EB/OL]. http://www. vcsun.org/~djordan/21/law 12 sp 21/neglnotes. htm. 2000-12-Spring.
  • 6[5]Evidence/Medical Malpractice. Causation standard for wrong death-Backer v. Guzon.http://biotech. law.lsu.edu/cases/evidence/Baker v. Guzon.htm[EB/ OL], 1997-07-22.
  • 7[6]Isom CA.Three important Qualities of a Medical Malpractice Paralegal[EB/OL]. http:// www. par alegals.org/ Reporter/ winter98/ medmal.htm.
  • 8[7]Lockhart KB. Professional Negligence Reports[J].Medical Legal Journal , 2000 69:122-123.
  • 9[9]Syllabus. Daubert vs. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals[EB/OL]. http://biotech.law./ su.edu/cases/evi dence/ daubert.htm, 1993-07-28.
  • 10[10]United States Court of Appeals. Second Circuit: Zuchowicz v. United Sates. http://cyber.law.har vard.edu/torts3y/readings. 1998.

共引文献52

同被引文献43

  • 1朱广友.医疗纠纷司法鉴定的基本原则[J].中国司法鉴定,2004(A01):3-8. 被引量:15
  • 2秦仕英.加强医患沟通的实践与效果[J].护理管理杂志,2005,5(6):50-52. 被引量:28
  • 3胡宁彬,沈健.医疗缺陷的分析与防范[J].医院管理论坛,2006,23(2):56-57. 被引量:3
  • 4医疗损害纠纷法医鉴定与处理实用手册.1SBN.978-7-5014-4363-5/D2143.
  • 5杨庆军.医疗纠纷成因及对策的几点思考人民网,全国百佳医院院长论坛.
  • 6Shen JF.Increasing internal migration in China from 1985 to 2005:Institutional versus economic drivers[J].Habitat Interna-tional,2013,39:1-7.
  • 7Zhang KH,Song SF.Rural-urban migration and urbanization in China:evidence from time-series and cross-section analyses[J].China Economic Review,2003,14(4):386-400.
  • 8朱传耿,顾朝林,张伟.中国城市流动人口的特征分析[J].人口学刊,2001,21(2):3-7.
  • 9陈特,赵长新.北京市法院医疗损害赔偿纠纷案件审判的情况、问题与初步意见[J].卫生法学通讯(北京卫生法学会),2009(2):55.
  • 10王汉亮,伶强,主编.医疗事故处理办法讲话[M].北京:法律出版社,1989:14.

引证文献5

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部