期刊文献+

小兴安岭林区森林覆盖率变化对小流域径流的影响 被引量:7

Impact of Forest Coverage on Forest Stream Flow Hydrology in Xiaoxing'an Mountains
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 立足于小兴安岭地区汤旺河流域,选取新林沟(抚育伐)和育林沟(皆伐)两个小流域,积累了33a的水分数据,通过双累积线法、非参数检验和相关性分析,分析了森林覆盖率变化对两个小流域径流量、洪峰流量、融雪径流量的影响。结果表明:在两个小流域之间,森林覆盖率的变化对这3个因子都产生了显著影响(p<0.01)。在育林沟小流域森林采伐后的造林过程中,随着森林覆盖率的增大,年径流深度、洪峰径流量和融雪径流量3个因子均呈逐步减小趋势,森林郁闭度达80%后,各因子均下降到与新林沟小流域相同的水平;新林沟小流域森林覆盖率常年稳定在80%左右,其径流各指标双累积线在这3个阶段均表现稳定。说明小兴安岭林区同一林分森林经营后森林覆盖率的增加有拦截洪峰径流的良好生态效益,同时也会减小年径流深度和融雪径流。 The effects of forest change on stream flow from small basins have been well documented; however,it has been discussed rarely in China. Availability of long-term hydrological and climatic data from 1973 to 2005,along with compared catchment (Xinlin catchment and Yulin catchment) in Tangwang River situated in Xiaoxing'an Mountains. Various statistical techniques including double mass curve,non-parametric tests and correlate analysis were applied to analyze the impacts of forest coverage change on annual runoff,peak flow and spring flow. The value of annual runoff-annual rainfall curve and peak flow-rainfall curve was stepwise increase in three sections,and spring flow in two sections. In contrary,Yulin catchment was steady during these sections. The results showed that annual mean runoff,spring flow and peak flow decreased when forest coverage increased.
出处 《水土保持学报》 CSCD 北大核心 2010年第1期16-19,共4页 Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(30870420 30771713)
关键词 森林覆盖率 径流量 洪峰流量 融雪径流量 双累积线 小流域 forest coverage stream flow peak flow spring flow double mass curve small watershel
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1李文华.森林的水文气候效应研究进展[C].北京:中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所,2001:10-16.
  • 2高甲荣,肖斌,张东升,李迈和.国外森林水文研究进展述评[J].水土保持学报,2001,15(5):60-64. 被引量:87
  • 3Andreassian V. Waters and forests: from historical controversy to scientific debate[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2004,291: 1- 27.
  • 4Cosandey C, Andreassian V, et al. The hydrological impact of the Mediterranean forest: a review of French research[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2005,301 : 235-249.
  • 5Calder I R. Forests and water-ensuring benefits outweigh water costs[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2007,251(1): 110-120.
  • 6Buttle J M, Metcalfe R A. Boreal forest disturbance and streamflow response, Northeastern Ontario[J]. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 2000,57 (2) : 5-18.
  • 7Jones J A. Hydrologic processes and peak discharge response to forest removal, regrowth, and roads in 10 small experimental basins, western Cascades, Oregon [J]. Water Resources Research, 2000,36(9) :2621-2642.
  • 8Thomas R B, Megahan W F. Peak flow responses to clear-cutting and roads in small and large basins, western Cascades, Oregon: a second opinion [J]. Water Recourse Research,1998,34: 3393-3403.
  • 9Harr R D, McCorisin F M. Initial effects of clearcut logging on size and timing of peak flows in a small watershed in western Oregon[J]. Water Recourse Research, 1979,15 : 90-94.
  • 10Sun G, Zhou G, Zhang Z, et al. Potential water yield reduction due to forestation across China[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2006,328 : 548-558.

二级参考文献30

共引文献174

同被引文献92

引证文献7

二级引证文献44

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部