3Willmann JK, Baumert B, Schertler T, et al. Aortoiliac and lower extremity arteries assessed with 16-detector row CT angiography: prospective comparison with digital subtraction angiography. Radi- ology,2005,236 ( 3 ) : 1083-1093.
4Martin ML,Tay KH,Flak B,et al. Mult ideteet or CT an giogra- phy of the aort oiliac system and lower extremities: a prospective comparison with digit al subtraction angiography. A JR, 2003,180 ( 4 ) : 1085-1091.
5Ferrer MD, Revert A J, Pallard Y, et al. T he evaluation of lower limb art-eriopathy by mutidetect or computed tomography com- pared with digit al sub tract ion angiography. Radiologia,2006,48 (6) :369-374.
6Thomas S, Simon W, Hatem A, et al. Sixteen-detect or row CT an- giography for lower-leg arterial occlusive disease : analysis of sec- tion width. Radiology,2005,237 ( 2 ) : 649-656.
7Justns ER, Dominik F, Arnold K, et al. Multipath curved planar reformation of the peripheral arterial tree in CT angiography. Ra- diology,2007,244( 1 ) :281-290.
8Ferrer MD, Revert A J, Pallard Y, et al. T he evaluation of lower limb art eriopathy by multidet ect or computed tomography com- pared with digit al subtraction angiography. Radiologia, 2006,48 (6) :369-374.
9Ota H,Takase K,Igarashi .K,et al. MDCT compared with digit al subtraction angiography for assessment of low er extremity art eria- locclusive disease:import ance of reviewing cross-section al ima- ges. AJR,2004,182 ( 1 ) :201-209.
10Lazarides MK, Georgiadis GS, Papas TT, et al. Diagnostic criteria and treatment of Buerger' s disease : a review[ J~. Int J Low Extrem- Wounds,2006,5 (2):89-95.
