期刊文献+

腹腔镜与开腹右半结肠切除术根治结肠癌围手术期比较 被引量:26

Perioperative comparison of laparoscopic and open right hemicolectomy for colon carcinoma
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨腹腔镜右半结肠切除术的可行性及近期疗效。方法:回顾分析2004年5月至2009年2月行腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治术22例及开腹右半结肠癌根治术17例患者的临床资料,比较两组患者手术及术后情况。结果:腹腔镜组与开腹组手术时间分别为(199.55±32.3)min、(144.71±28.97)min,差异无统计学意义(P=0.099);切口长度分别为(5.55±0.74)cm、(19.24±2.67)cm,差异有统计学意义(P=0.00);出血量分别为(53.41±43.08)ml、(138.24±65.02)ml,差异有统计学意义(P=0.024);淋巴结清除数分别为(12.73±2.16)枚、(13.12±2.55)枚,差异无统计学意义(P=0.41);术后胃肠道功能恢复时间分别为(23.18±7.79)h、(64.18±13.07)h,差异有统计学意义(P=0.02)。结论:腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治术安全可行,具有患者创伤小,术后康复快的优点,根治效果可达到开腹手术的水平。 Objective:To investigate the feasibility and short-term therapeutic effect of laparoscopic hemicolectomy for colon carcinoma.Methods:The clinical data of 22 cases underwent laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for colon carcinoma and 17 cases underwent open right hemicolectomy for colon carcinoma from May 2004 to Feb.2009 was retrospectively analyzed.Their perioperative conditions were analyzed.Results:The mean operative time of laparoscopic group and open group was(199.55±32.3)min and(144.71±28.97)min respectively,however,the difference between two groups was insignificant(P=0.099);The incision length of laparoscopic group was obviously shorter than that of open group[(5.55±0.74)cm vs.(19.24±2.67)cm](P=0.00);And the intra-operative blood loss of laparoscopic group was obviously less than that of open group [(53.41±43.08)ml vs.(138.24±65.02)ml](P=0.024);Moreover,there was no significant difference between the number of cleared lymph nodes [(12.73±2.16) vs.(13.12±2.55)](P=0.41);The gastrointestinal function of laparoscopic group recovered more quickly than open group[(23.18±7.79)h vs.(64.18±13.07)h](P=0.02).Conclusions:The laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for colon carcinoma is safe and effective.It has advantages of less blood loss and trauma,earlier postoperative recovery,and similar radical effect as laparotomy.
机构地区 株洲市一医院
出处 《腹腔镜外科杂志》 2010年第5期349-351,共3页 Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery
关键词 结肠肿瘤 腹腔镜检查 右半结肠癌根治术 对比研究 Colonic neoplasms Laparoscopy Right hemicolectomy Comparative study
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献23

  • 1郑民华,冯波.从循证医学谈腹腔镜与开腹结直肠癌手术的比较[J].临床外科杂志,2005,13(11):676-678. 被引量:37
  • 2牟一平,杨鹏,严加费,陈其龙,袁晓明,朱玲华,徐晓武.腹腔镜结肠癌根治术的临床疗效评估[J].中华外科杂志,2006,44(9):581-583. 被引量:83
  • 3Kitano S,Shiraishi N.Minimally invasive surgery for gastric tumors[J].Surg Clin North Am,2005; 85(1):151.
  • 4Heemskerk J,van Gemert WG,Greve JW,et al.Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication:a comparative retrospective study on costs and time consumption[J].Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech,2007; 17(1):1.
  • 5DeNoto G,Rubach E,Ravikumar TS.A standardized technique for robotically performed sigmoid colectomy[J].J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A,2006; 16(6):551.
  • 6Rockall TA,Darzi A.Robot-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery[J].Surg Clin North Am,2003; 83(6):1463.
  • 7Janson M,Bjorholt I,Carlsson P,et al.Randomized clinical trial of the costs of open and laparoscopic surgery for colonic cancer[J].Br J Surg,2004; 91(4):409.
  • 8Draaisma WA,Buskens E,Bais JE,et al.Randomized clinical trial and follow-up study of cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic versus conventional Nissen fundoplication[J].Br J Surg,2006; 93(6):690.
  • 9Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group.A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer[J].N Engl J Med,2004; 350(20):2050.
  • 10Lacy AM,Garcia-Valdecasas JC,Delgado S,et al.Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer:a randomised trial[J].Lancet,2002; 359(9325):2224.

共引文献91

同被引文献199

引证文献26

二级引证文献176

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部