期刊文献+

拜复乐治疗细菌感染性疾病的双盲随机对照研究 被引量:3

Randomized double-blind control trail of the moxifloxacina and sulbactam/cetopazone in treatment of bacterial infections
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察拜复乐(莫西沙星)的临床疗效及安全性。方法以舒普深为对照,采用双盲、随机、对照的方法将符合入选条件的患者172例,随机分为试药组与对照组各86例。试药组给予拜复乐0.4g静脉滴注1次/天;对照组给予舒普深2g静脉滴注1次/8小时,疗程均为7-14天。结果试药组临床有效率为91%,细菌清除率为95%,不良反应发生率为7%;对照组临床有效率为92%,细菌清除率为93%,不良反应发生率为6%。经统计学处理两组各参数均无显著性差异(P〉0.05)。体外抗菌作用结果显示拜复乐抑菌效果显著。结论拜复乐用于治疗多种细菌感染性疾病,特别是耐药菌株引起的感染临床疗效确凿且不良反应轻微,其每日单次给药、依从性好,是一种安全、高效、方便的抗菌药物。 Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of moxifloxacina in treatment of bacterial infections.Methods 172 patients with bacterial infections were recruited and randomized divided to two groups.One group was treated with 0.4 g moxifloxacina intravenous injection one per day and another group with 4 g sulbactam/cetopazone dissolved in 100 ml 0.9% sodium chloride,one per 8 hours.Results The effective rate,bacterial clearance rate and incidence of side effect for moxifloxacina were 91%,95% and 7%;and for sulbactam/cetopazone were 92%,93% and 6% respectively.And there were no obviously difference between two groups.Conclusion Moxifloxacina is as safe and effective as sulbactam/cetopazone in treatment of infections.
出处 《西部医学》 2010年第6期1014-1016,共3页 Medical Journal of West China
关键词 拜复乐 舒普深 细菌感染性疾病 临床疗效 随机对照 Moxifloxacina Sulbactam/cetopazone Bacterial infections disease Clinical efficiency Random control
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献12

  • 1何礼贤.第5讲 应用莫西沙星治疗医院获得性肺炎的临床前景[J].中国实用内科杂志,2005,25(12):1148-1150. 被引量:15
  • 2彭兰,陈孝进.泌尿系感染病原菌及耐药性调查[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2006,16(1):110-111. 被引量:26
  • 3Jones RN, Barry AL, Thomsberry C, et al. The cefoperazonesulbactam combination: invitro gualities including beta-lactamase stability, antimicrobial activity, and interpretive criteria for disk diffusion tests[ J]. AJCP, 1985,84:496.
  • 4Zhanel GG,Nore, ddin AM. Pharmacokenetics and phamacodynamics of the new fluoroquinolones: focus on respiratory infection[ J]. Curt Opin Parmacol,2001,1:459-463.
  • 5Behra-Miellet J, Dubrcuil L, Jumas-Bilake E. Antinanaerobic activity of moxifloxacin compared with that of ofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, clidamycin, metronidazolcn and beta-lactams [ J ]. Int J Antimicrob Agents,2002,20:366-374.
  • 6Jones RN, Barry AL, Thomsberry C, et al. The cefoperazonesulbactam combination: in vitro gualities including beta-lactamase stability, antimicrobial activity, and interpretive criteria for disk diffusion tests[ J]. AJCP,1985 ,84 :496.
  • 7Chodosh S, Deabatc CA, Havcrstock D, ct al. Shortcoursc moxifloxacin therapy for treatment of acute becterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis[ J ]. Respir IVied, 2000,94 ( 1 ) : 17- 26.
  • 8胡必杰.实用内科学.人民卫生出版社,2001:1576.
  • 9Pamela A Hunter.莫西沙星[J].中国实用内科杂志,2002,22(10):635-638. 被引量:13
  • 10谢国强,王春新,盛裕芬,赵琪.泌尿系大肠埃希菌感染耐药性及其产超广谱β-内酰胺酶分析[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2002,12(12):950-951. 被引量:56

共引文献12

同被引文献18

引证文献3

二级引证文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部